Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

No Time to Cut Nuke Spending -

Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:54 pm
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:54 pm
US Facing Two Peer Nuclear Threat Countries at Same Time, for First Time
quote:

For the first time in American history, the nation is facing “two nuclear-capable strategic peer adversaries at the same time,” which is why maintaining and upgrading the U.S. nuclear deterrence force is more critical now than ever. This warning was delivered on Tuesday to the Senate Armed Services Committee budget hearing by Navy Adm. Charles A. Richard, commander of U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).

The stark warning is likely aimed at wavering Democrat lawmakers, who, as I have written here, are under pressure from the left wing of their party to reduce or eliminate many U.S. nuclear weapons modernization programs. President Biden has also expressed his desire to significantly cut the U.S. nuclear arsenal, as I’ve noted.

STRATCOM controls the nation’s nuclear triad, which consists of strategic bombers, ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

And the two peer threat countries are of course, Russia and China.

The role of nuclear forces is not just to deter nuclear conflict, but also to deter conventional war and adventurism by adversaries. In that regard, said the Admiral, “Chinese and Russian [nuclear] advances are eroding our conventional deterrence.” Or our ability to deter war with conventional forces alone.

As I have written here and here, Richard reminded the committee that China is rapidly expanding its strategic nuclear capabilities and are on pace to at least double their nuclear weapons stockpile by the end of the decade.

Defense.gov News stated that “the admiral mentioned that Chinese ICBMs can be mounted on trucks so their location can be concealed. They also have modern, sixth generation nuclear-capable strategic bombers and submarines.”

The site added that Richard explained that while “China is capable of executing any plausible nuclear employment strategy regionally now and will soon be able to do so at intercontinental ranges,” Russia remains the “pacing nuclear strategic threat.”

According to Richard, Russia, under Vladimir Putin, is aggressively engaged in conventional and nuclear capability modernization, which is approximately 80 percent complete.

Meanwhile, Richard added, the U.S. nuclear modernization effort has not even begun. Given these growing threats, modernization of the nuclear triad is the Pentagon’s top priority, he said.
LINK
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
12063 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:58 pm to
Doesn't Russia also have to worry about France and the UK?

China have to worry about India?
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22218 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:00 pm to
Ground work for the taxpayer dollars to MIC gravy train we all know is coming under Dems.
Posted by goldenturbo
Member since Jul 2020
762 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:08 pm to
Oh....maybe that's why they added a guide on "How to stay safe in the event of a nuclear explosion" to the ready.gov website.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13489 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:10 pm to
Cut welfare and move that money to USSTRATCOM.

Problem solved.

(We could also stop giving money to illegal immigrants, that would save a bunch of money)
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13489 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:11 pm to
Not me.

Ill be heading outside and waiting to get melted.

Who wants to live in a cave for the next 500,000 years? I got better stuff to do than that.


Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
2438 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:13 pm to
Let’s see....die instantly if you are within a 2 mile radius of the blast, die within a few days from third degree burns or die within a few months from no food and contaminated water. That’s what that pamphlet should say.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89480 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

China


Since the corrupt Clinton administration allowed (for a fee of course) the Chicoms to peek at advanced missile technology, they accelerated their capabilities about 20, 25 years. But for that, we would still have had some time.

But, we don't.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
8044 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

The stark warning is likely aimed at wavering Democrat lawmakers, who, as I have written here, are under pressure from the left wing of their party to reduce or eliminate many U.S. nuclear weapons modernization programs. President Biden has also expressed his desire to significantly cut the U.S. nuclear arsenal, as I’ve noted.


Of course they are considering cutting funding to maintaining and advancing our nuclear arsenal. It makes perfect sense.

1. We've got so many illegal aliens that we have to put up in hotel rooms, something had to be cut out of the budget.
2. It makes the takeover from his CCP overlords easier.
Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
2438 posts
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:28 pm to
What we need are faster delivered warheads. Not so much for a first strike attack but the ability to get most of our ICBM’s out of the silos before they are given a direct hit. What we should also push for are more sub based nukes as this is the second alternative for retaliation just in case China or Russia cripples our ability to launch with an EMP attack or their super sonic speed nukes hitting full silos.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram