- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No Time to Cut Nuke Spending -
Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:54 pm
US Facing Two Peer Nuclear Threat Countries at Same Time, for First Time
quote:LINK
For the first time in American history, the nation is facing “two nuclear-capable strategic peer adversaries at the same time,” which is why maintaining and upgrading the U.S. nuclear deterrence force is more critical now than ever. This warning was delivered on Tuesday to the Senate Armed Services Committee budget hearing by Navy Adm. Charles A. Richard, commander of U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).
The stark warning is likely aimed at wavering Democrat lawmakers, who, as I have written here, are under pressure from the left wing of their party to reduce or eliminate many U.S. nuclear weapons modernization programs. President Biden has also expressed his desire to significantly cut the U.S. nuclear arsenal, as I’ve noted.
STRATCOM controls the nation’s nuclear triad, which consists of strategic bombers, ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
And the two peer threat countries are of course, Russia and China.
The role of nuclear forces is not just to deter nuclear conflict, but also to deter conventional war and adventurism by adversaries. In that regard, said the Admiral, “Chinese and Russian [nuclear] advances are eroding our conventional deterrence.” Or our ability to deter war with conventional forces alone.
As I have written here and here, Richard reminded the committee that China is rapidly expanding its strategic nuclear capabilities and are on pace to at least double their nuclear weapons stockpile by the end of the decade.
Defense.gov News stated that “the admiral mentioned that Chinese ICBMs can be mounted on trucks so their location can be concealed. They also have modern, sixth generation nuclear-capable strategic bombers and submarines.”
The site added that Richard explained that while “China is capable of executing any plausible nuclear employment strategy regionally now and will soon be able to do so at intercontinental ranges,” Russia remains the “pacing nuclear strategic threat.”
According to Richard, Russia, under Vladimir Putin, is aggressively engaged in conventional and nuclear capability modernization, which is approximately 80 percent complete.
Meanwhile, Richard added, the U.S. nuclear modernization effort has not even begun. Given these growing threats, modernization of the nuclear triad is the Pentagon’s top priority, he said.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 3:58 pm to Wolfhound45
Doesn't Russia also have to worry about France and the UK?
China have to worry about India?
China have to worry about India?
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:00 pm to Wolfhound45
Ground work for the taxpayer dollars to MIC gravy train we all know is coming under Dems.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:08 pm to Wolfhound45
Oh....maybe that's why they added a guide on "How to stay safe in the event of a nuclear explosion" to the ready.gov website.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:10 pm to Wolfhound45
Cut welfare and move that money to USSTRATCOM.
Problem solved.
(We could also stop giving money to illegal immigrants, that would save a bunch of money)
Problem solved.
(We could also stop giving money to illegal immigrants, that would save a bunch of money)
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:11 pm to goldenturbo
Not me.
Ill be heading outside and waiting to get melted.
Who wants to live in a cave for the next 500,000 years? I got better stuff to do than that.
Ill be heading outside and waiting to get melted.
Who wants to live in a cave for the next 500,000 years? I got better stuff to do than that.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:13 pm to goldenturbo
Let’s see....die instantly if you are within a 2 mile radius of the blast, die within a few days from third degree burns or die within a few months from no food and contaminated water. That’s what that pamphlet should say.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:15 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
China
Since the corrupt Clinton administration allowed (for a fee of course) the Chicoms to peek at advanced missile technology, they accelerated their capabilities about 20, 25 years. But for that, we would still have had some time.
But, we don't.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:18 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
The stark warning is likely aimed at wavering Democrat lawmakers, who, as I have written here, are under pressure from the left wing of their party to reduce or eliminate many U.S. nuclear weapons modernization programs. President Biden has also expressed his desire to significantly cut the U.S. nuclear arsenal, as I’ve noted.
Of course they are considering cutting funding to maintaining and advancing our nuclear arsenal. It makes perfect sense.
1. We've got so many illegal aliens that we have to put up in hotel rooms, something had to be cut out of the budget.
2. It makes the takeover from his CCP overlords easier.
Posted on 4/21/21 at 4:28 pm to Placekicker
What we need are faster delivered warheads. Not so much for a first strike attack but the ability to get most of our ICBM’s out of the silos before they are given a direct hit. What we should also push for are more sub based nukes as this is the second alternative for retaliation just in case China or Russia cripples our ability to launch with an EMP attack or their super sonic speed nukes hitting full silos.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News