re: No Link, Just My Personal Opinion. The Seth Rich Murder is Not a Closed Matter

quote:

---

it could be said that we're passionate about our patriotism

---

The only thing you are passionate about is what fits your narrative, otherwise I would not have said what I did

quote:

---

The only thing you are passionate about is what fits your narrative, otherwise I would not have said what I did

---

Have you actually taken the time to look around and see what's going on right now? Hate to break it to you, but it's the people in the Q thread who have been right about what's coming. The Mueller report has been out exactly 1 month as of today. Just look how much the narrative has changed in 30 days. And now, Comey and Brennan are fighting with each other. Strzok and Page are throwing Loretta Lynch under the bus. You think there would be in-fighting between these swamp rats if they didn't think they were in trouble?

Sorry, but you guys who mocked us and [some) still attack us were wrong on this. Hell, at least have the decency to stop attacking people who were simply trying to wake you up.

quote:

---

Hate to break it to you, but it's the people in the Q thread who have been right about what's coming.

---

Ah, the ole "soon" thing.

quote:

---

Sorry, but you guys who mocked us and [some) still attack us were wrong on this.

---

Let me know when the perp walks happen, other than "soon"

quote:

---

Hell, at least have the decency to stop attacking people who were simply trying to wake you up.

---

Your persecution complex is your own doing

quote:

---

It makes me wonder if the perpetual Q thread boo-birds have really thought their position through. When they say that nothing's going to happen when it comes to Prosecuting people for Spygate and the FISA abuses, they're saying that they acknowledge somebody has hijacked our Republic, totally thumbed their nose at the rule of law and they're totally fine with it because, reasons.

---

No, what us boo-birds are saying is that we would like to try and comment and offer counters to what you are laying out, but unfortunately, we are deleted with a quickness, so it's just a meme now in regards to the Q thread

quote:

---

This is where they RA the thread for an anchor. 

---

This is the second time you've talked about the thread being anchored or deleted. I'm sure you've RA'd it.

What are you so afraid of, CA?


PS - I have kept my powder dry regarding you, and even tried to extend an olive branch several times. Byt honey, as of today my patience has officially run out with you.


You will regret pushing me too far, CA. You probably already do. Hey, sorry this thread rustled your XXL panties.

You're more than welcome to weigh in. Despite the internal PTB narrative that new participants aren't welcome, it's quite the opposite. There have been a number of avowed skeptics who contribute on a regular basis. bmy comes to mind, off the top of my head.

He's been very respectful, and seems genuinely interested in contributing to the discussion.

What is NOT welcome, however, is when the local lunatic fringe liberal's name comes up in the rotation for their turn to drive by the thread and post what equates to "Y'all are still going on about this horse shite?".

Anything but constructive.

quote:

---

I'd posit that given the fact that our republic has been under full-on DS control since JFK (with significant evidence to argue that's it's since Lincoln), going from what happened to Candidate Trump to where we are today in less than 2 years is practically light speed.

---

I'd posit that I've seen this entire conspiracy played out numerous times before, whether it be anything from Bigfoot, Madeleine McCann, 9/11, ISIS propaganda, number stations, cicada 3301, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas (which I'll agree is fricking strange), crisis actors, pedo youtubers, even Andrew WK for chrissakes

I've seen these on numerous platforms...whether it be here, JREF, 4chan, frick, even BB.com...it's always the same shite. All I'm saying is that the one outlier I've seen with all of these types of conversations, is that this particular one has such a safe space here that it's just become a meme to me. Debate and facing criticism is fun, but not in the Q thread...if you're not a Q loving patriot saving the planet, then you are deleted

Just accept and acknowledge that and the "mocking" would go away and the persecution complex would subside

I don't have any control over what gets marked for deletion, who gets banned, etc, so all of that is well over my pay grade. I'm just an anon like everyone else who posts.

My participation in the thread has actually dwindled over what it was a year ago, because there is no benefit in preaching to the Already Convinced. I'd be shocked if 10% of the content that I post online makes it into the QThread, TBH. I make it a point to participate in Spygate and Q-adjacent topics, but rarely invoke Q "himself." (I'll make exceptions if someone is spouting senseless rhetoric that's been debunked).

My mission is to ensure that I do my part to get the word out on Twitter and elsewhere, because the MSM sure as shite isn't going to do it. Personally, if impartial journalism were still a thing, we wouldn't need a Q to act as a back channel to cut through the horse shite.

Part of the "problem" is that the thread has been going for so long, that only the most devoted of folks have hung in there. As a natural result, there will always be a trickle of people who stop in and are genuinely curious/interested in discussing things they see in the news, but unbeknownst to them, unless it't hardcore breaking news, then it's likely been discussed ad nauseum among the regulars.

That response usually goes something like this:



No, it's not the most friendly confines for newcomers. We probably should be better about that, but at the same time, imagine how well it would be received if someone waltzed up as the finale for Game of Thrones were airing, and said, "Cliff's notes? This looks stupid. Dragons don't exist."

Yes, we acknowledge that the first couple of drops on /pol/ were in response to a post that said that HRC would be arrested on Oct. 30, 2017. We don't know what to make of that. It's a little frustrating to try and figure it out, because none of us know the significance of it. Maybe it's total disinfo. And that's not a cop out. There's a possibility that it was framed with a specific date to grab everyone by the virtual lapels. (Hint: If so, it worked).

A few days later, specific dates were given for Huma's and Podesta's indictments. Did it happen on those days? We don't know for certain, but there's also the distinct chance that if it were correct, those indictments could be among the tens of thousands of sealed federal records. We're only going to know that they exist when/if they're unsealed. If it comes out that those indictments were filed that day, that'll be a gigantic eye-opener for folks who are on the outside looking in.

quote:

---

I just saw the shot you took at me in another thread, so you can go frick yourself.

---

quote:

---

Just one question, though. When the indictments start rolling in, will you manu up and admit you were dead wrong?

---

What exactly am I dead wrong about? You don't even know my stances on, well, anything

ETA: I upvoted you just because