- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nice job, Pam. Keep up the good work.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:50 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 2/27/26 at 12:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That picture is from Lutnick's Dec 2012 visit. He's testified about it. Lutnick's wife coordinated the visit with Epstein's assistant. Lutnick, his wife, four children, and nannies, plus another couple and their children, subsequently had lunch with Epstein on the island. In his congressional testimony on February 10, 2026, Lutnick described the visit, and said the lunch lasted about an hour, then both families left.
Judging from the replies to your post, now we can see why there is such trepidation over “releasing every bit of information so we can decide for ourselves” to anyone and everyone. Too many folks are too immature and incapable of responsibly and rationally handling said information, too immature and incapable of drawing reasonable and rational conclusions and inferences, if left to their own devices.
1
Posted on 2/27/26 at 1:56 pm to Geekboy
Ok, so the script called for Blondie to toss out a chicken bone. Oooh, I hope no one gets in big trouble for this.
So a 'deleted Epstein' photo no less featuring an "innocent" Lutnick before having lunch with the wife and kids....AND Mr. E-File. Body language is interesting.
So a 'deleted Epstein' photo no less featuring an "innocent" Lutnick before having lunch with the wife and kids....AND Mr. E-File. Body language is interesting.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:01 pm to davyjones
quote:
Too many folks are too immature and incapable of responsibly and rationally handling said information, too immature and incapable of drawing reasonable and rational conclusions and inferences, if left to their own devices.
So how would you propose discerning exactly who is "capable of responsibly and rationally handling said information"? By what criteria?
And how would you define "rational conclusions"?
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:05 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Trump needs to get rid of Lutnick. He is damaged goods.
He is, you're 100% right. He's a liability and was already caught perjuring himself.
However, you know how this whole power-echelon situation and diversion will go -- "LOOK SQUIRREL!!"
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:35 pm to Geekboy
What and who am I looking at here?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:57 pm to Geekboy
It seems apparent that Lutnick is a dirty arse scumbag. Trump really needs to cut ties with that dude.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 2:58 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Trump needs to get rid of Lutnick. He is damaged goods. No one in the administration should spend an ounce of energy defending this guy. Just quietly jettison him alread
It is sad that you get massive downvotes for this.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:04 pm to Tiger in NY
Lol if you take at face value and believe word for word every bad thing said or “reported” about Trump and his administration, then I suppose Trump should have gotten rid of every single person, including himself, on day one. Some folks are just a tad more skeptical and need more than a mere narrowly worded, nice sounding negative/terrible accusation against Trump or his admin in order to definitively condemn.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:08 pm to davyjones
quote:
Lol if you take at face value and believe word for word every bad thing said or “reported” about Trump and his administration, then I suppose Trump should have gotten rid of every single person, including himself, on day one. Some folks are just a tad more skeptical and need more than a mere narrowly worded, nice sounding negative/terrible accusation against Trump or his admin in order to definitively condemn.
I don't take anything at face value regarding what the MSM and dems say about the Trump admin. I support the Admin completely and want them to succeed. I think Lutnick is a harm to that end. His associations with Epstein are too apparent, he lied about it, and then there's the whole not being there on 9/11 thing lol
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:12 pm to Geekboy
Pam asked for a recess and returned to correct a mistake in the release.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 3:13 pm to Tiger in NY
There is some smoke around Lutnik apparently, I’ll give you that, and I didn’t mean to come across too harshly there, but I guess what I see as the problem is that because “reporting” as a general matter has painted itself into a corner as being totally untrustworthy and manipulative, it’s just a natural reaction to damn near believe the complete opposite of what a given piece is purporting to say.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News