- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Next to be debunked - Intel Community Assessment on Russian Interference
Posted on 12/13/19 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 12/13/19 at 1:54 pm
They used the Dossier in the intel assessment along with "other sources".
Dossier has been disproven.
Durham is going to find that the other "sources" for the assessment were the same as the "sources" for the Dossier.
**Clapper said on CNN that they "had some concern about the Dossier from the standpoint of it's sourcing which they couldn't corroborate but at the same time some of the subsantive content of the dossier they were able to corroborate in the intel assessment from "other sources".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etHzugPa0DY[/link
Dossier has been disproven.
Durham is going to find that the other "sources" for the assessment were the same as the "sources" for the Dossier.
**Clapper said on CNN that they "had some concern about the Dossier from the standpoint of it's sourcing which they couldn't corroborate but at the same time some of the subsantive content of the dossier they were able to corroborate in the intel assessment from "other sources".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etHzugPa0DY[/link
This post was edited on 12/13/19 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 12/13/19 at 2:16 pm to boomtown143
Nah, Russia tried to interfere. They weren’t particularly good at it, but arguing that they didn’t do anything is a self-defeating position.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 2:33 pm to boomtown143
This has already been debunked
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:17 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Nah, Russia tried to interfere. They weren’t particularly good at it, but arguing that they didn’t do anything is a self-defeating position.
Unless it wasn't a hack but rather a leak (Seth Rich). And the "insurance policy" was framing Trump & Russia made possible by destroying evidence and having Crowdstrike withold the DNC server.
Seth Rich was murdered July 10th 2016. The FBI met with Steele July 5th and HRC during 4th of July weekend. July 2016 was a very busy month for the DNC and the FBI.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:28 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Nah, Russia tried to interfere. They weren’t particularly good at it, but arguing that they didn’t do anything is a self-defeating position.
I think the argument is not that Russia didn't interfere whatsoever, rather the extent and effect is what's in dispute.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:30 pm to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Nah, Russia tried to interfere. They weren’t particularly good at it, but arguing that they didn’t do anything is a self-defeating position.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:31 pm to davyjones
I agree, which is why I’d rather we keep the focus on the extent and impact of the interference rather than whether or not any interference occurred
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:35 pm to funnystuff
Of course Russia tried to interfere, as I’m sure every other country of note on the planet did and always has done. Just like we interfere in the governments of countries everywhere all the time.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 3:37 pm to funnystuff
Of course the debate gets super heated bc inevitably the insinuation enters in that Trump wouldn't have won without the Russians. The debate goes to shite from there.
But yeah, I think I overheard Hannity the other night even say something very close to "Of course the Russians interfered, just not to the extent yadda yadda"...
But yeah, I think I overheard Hannity the other night even say something very close to "Of course the Russians interfered, just not to the extent yadda yadda"...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News