- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nanc says the President is breaking the law...
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Can you direct me to where hearsay negates a whistle blower claim? I'd like to learn more about this.
I'm not googling it for you.
2
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:47 pm to BuckyCheese
this may be good news, the whistleblower is going to have to release his source. May be able to get rid of a lot of rats.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:51 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Can you direct me to where hearsay negates a whistle blower claim? I'd like to learn more about this.
In court a person just hearing something but had no evidence, was not present would be told by the judge to get boff the stand. Because this now rises to the level of gossip. It does not matter that this person is in the IC and would be in a position to know, if this person does not have the transcript, does not have a recording and was not there, it is extremely prejudicial as testimony, etc. You're not a whistleblower, you're The Star
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:51 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
I'm not googling it for you.
I have and I don't think it does negate it. That's why I'm asking.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:53 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
In court a person just hearing something but had no evidence, was not present would be told by the judge to get boff the stand. Because this now rises to the level of gossip. It does not matter that this person is in the IC and would be in a position to know, if this person does not have the transcript, does not have a recording and was not there, it is extremely prejudicial as testimony, etc. You're not a whistleblower, you're The Star
This isn't a court of law. The IG has a duty to investigate the claim and determine if the claim is credible and urgent- which he did determine. I don't see how hearsay is relevant at that point.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:54 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Then why doesn't he testify? what the frick is the point trotting out someone with second hand knowledge? even when an unredacted transcript is literally being released....
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:57 pm to Magician2
quote:
Then why doesn't he testify? what the frick is the point trotting out someone with second hand knowledge? even when an unredacted transcript is literally being released....
He's supposed to this Thursday I believe.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 4:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Him testifying makes a world more sense and credibility than the whistleblower.
That person is literally useless now that the transcript is being released.
That person is literally useless now that the transcript is being released.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News