- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson is a fraud
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:54 pm
The whole article is good but this is a summary:
https://wkrg.com/2017/11/20/roy-moore-campaign-attempts-to-debunk-accusers-claims/
quote:
On Monday evening, the Moore Campaign unveiled statements from key witnesses that completely bust the story of Beverly Nelson and Gloria Allred and further reveal an unconscionable bias on the part of state and national press to hide the truth from Alabama voters who will undoubtedly see through the “fake news” and elect Judge Moore for the man that they have always known him to be.
According to a former waitress, Olde Hickory House required employees to be 16 years old. Nelson claims she was 15 when she started.
According to two former employees, the dumpsters were on the side of the building. Nelson claimed that they were in the back.
Olde Hickory House sat right off of the four-lane highway and had a wrap-around porch with lights all around it. Nelson claimed that the surroundings were “dark and isolated.”
Rhonda Ledbetter, who worked at Olde Hickory House for almost 3 years, states that the earliest it closed was at 11 p.m. but she believes it was open until midnight. She is certain it did not close at 10:00 because Goodyear was next door, and employees came to eat when their shift ended at 10 p.m. Nelson claims her story occurred after the restaurant closed at 10 p.m.
It is unlikely that there was an entrance from the back of the parking lot, which Nelson claimed existed. Multiple sources have claimed that everyone parked on the sides of the building because there wasn’t much room behind the restaurant, according to Rhonda not enough room to turn around. Renee Schivera stated that a neighborhood backed up to the parking lot and it was adjacent to the backyards of people’s houses, so she did not see how there would have been a back entrance as it would have gone through someone’s yard.
Nelson claimed that Judge Roy Moore came in almost every night and sat at the counter, but former employees state that customers at the counter were served by the bartender or short order cook – not served by the waitresses and had no reason to interact with the wait staff. Additionally, two former waitresses and two former patrons state they never saw Judge Moore come into the restaurant.
These witnesses have shared their testimony with multiple news outlets. The outlets have failed to report.
https://wkrg.com/2017/11/20/roy-moore-campaign-attempts-to-debunk-accusers-claims/
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:00 pm to tigersbh
Not an article. A press release.
Useful.
Useful.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:01 pm to tigersbh
I want that lawsuit over the yearbook so that it can be properly examined and then questions asked of the accuser and Allred of who is responsible for the fraud.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:05 pm to tigersbh
yea that’s not an article. it’s a statement from the moore campaign
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:05 pm to teke184
quote:
I want that lawsuit over the yearbook so that it can be properly examined and then questions asked of the accuser and Allred of who is responsible for the fraud.
Yes, Gloria Allred is happy to delay the analysis of that yearbook. I wonder why?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:09 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
yea that’s not an article. it’s a statement from the moore campaign
Which of the facts or witness statements do you find to be false?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:13 pm to More&Les
quote:
Which of the facts or witness statements do you find to be false?
i find portraying a statement from the moore campaign as an article to be false
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:15 pm to tigersbh
AL.com: Don't believe Roy Moore's accusers? Then listen to Moore
quote:
First, read his book. In it, Moore describes how he met his wife at a Christmas party hosted by friends. He would have been 37. She was 23.
"Many years before, I had attended a dance recital at Gadsden State Junior College," Moore wrote. "I remembered one of the special dances performed by a young woman whose first and last names began with the letter 'K.' It was something I had never forgotten. Could that young woman have been Kayla Kisor?"
Moore later determined that it was.
"Long afterward, I would learn that Kayla had, in fact, performed a special dance routine at Gadsden State years before," he wrote.
Take a second to think about what's being said here.
Moore first took notice of Kayla at a dance recital? Perhaps you're wondering what "many years" means, and I wondered that too. Luckily, Moore again has cleared that up for us.
In an interview Moore gave earlier this year, he gave a similar account, but for one detail.
"It was, oh gosh, eight years later, or something, I met her," Moore said. "And when she told me her name, I remembered 'K. K.,' and I said, 'Haven't I met you before?'"
It's a simple matter of subtraction. When Roy Moore first took notice of Kayla she would have been as young as 15.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:17 pm to tigersbh
Everyone knows she’s a fraud.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:25 pm to FairhopeTider
well there's some mental gymnastics.
They use his "taking notice" of a supposedly 15 year old Kayla to reinforce the notion that he's a pedophile and reason to believe his accusers. But then he doesn't actually meet her until 8 years later when she's 23.
They use his "taking notice" of a supposedly 15 year old Kayla to reinforce the notion that he's a pedophile and reason to believe his accusers. But then he doesn't actually meet her until 8 years later when she's 23.
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:33 pm to Lsuhoohoo
And we haven’t seen mental gymnastics used to defend him?
At least the article has some basis in reality. It lays out how he was at a girls’ dance recital when he first noticed his future wife and she was 15. I’ll avoid the obvious question of “What the frick was he doing at a teenage girls’ dance recital as a 30-something without a kid involved?” and give him the benefit of the doubt that he had a valid reason to be there. That aside, it states the recital was in 1977, the same year the other accusers say he was moving on them.
At least the article has some basis in reality. It lays out how he was at a girls’ dance recital when he first noticed his future wife and she was 15. I’ll avoid the obvious question of “What the frick was he doing at a teenage girls’ dance recital as a 30-something without a kid involved?” and give him the benefit of the doubt that he had a valid reason to be there. That aside, it states the recital was in 1977, the same year the other accusers say he was moving on them.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News