- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mohammed to be most popular baby name in Germany, Austria, Britain
Posted on 1/25/18 at 6:52 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 6:52 am
quote:
According to the Gesellschaft für Deutsche Sprache (Society for German Language, GfdS), often labelled as the most important language society in Germany, the name Mohammed has seen a rapid rise in popularity, though the name could be even more popular than their figures suggest, Die Welt reports.
quote:
Mohammed is already one of the most popular, if not the most popular name for baby boys in many places across Europe. In September, Breitbart London reported that Mohammed was, for the fifth year running, the most popular boy’s name in London and the West Midlands. When all the variations of the spelling of the name are taken into account, it is also the most popular boy’s name in England and Wales.
LINK
All the little Mohamed’s running around, how sweet.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 6:53 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 6:54 am to Strannix
Those countries finna be so peaceful
Posted on 1/25/18 at 6:56 am to Strannix
Seems there has been an explosion in the Muslim population.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 7:05 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:00 am to PsychTiger
quote:
So, there has been an explosion in the Muslim population.
Cmon man don't be islamophobic. Most of the Muslim population does truck attacks these days
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:01 am to Strannix
While still troubling, it doesn’t mean Muslims are out reproducing the natives overall by any means. Still scary to think of it being a much larger percentage than it should be
You have to take into account the percentage of Muslim boys that are named Mohammed vs English boys named any single English name. If half the Muslims name their son Mohammed and only 5% of Britts name there son John (names more diverse) its at least not as bad as it seems.
I have no idea if this is the case but it’s my assumption. And yes I know they have a higher birth rate, just not high enough with their numbers to lead to any sort of majority by the next generation. Not looking great down the line though
You have to take into account the percentage of Muslim boys that are named Mohammed vs English boys named any single English name. If half the Muslims name their son Mohammed and only 5% of Britts name there son John (names more diverse) its at least not as bad as it seems.
I have no idea if this is the case but it’s my assumption. And yes I know they have a higher birth rate, just not high enough with their numbers to lead to any sort of majority by the next generation. Not looking great down the line though
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 7:13 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:04 am to Lsuchs
quote:
it doesn’t mean Muslims are out reproducing the natives by any means. Still scary to think of it being a much larger percentage than it should be
What percentage of native vs Islamic reproduction would you consider acceptable? What is the birth rate of Germans, Austrians, Britons in the Islamic countries? How iare any of these nations populations becoming more like the nations they destroyed and fled good for the invaded nations?
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:06 am to Strannix
quote:
What percentage of native vs Islamic reproduction would you consider acceptable? What is the birth rate of Germans, Austrians, Britons in the Islamic countries? How iare any of these nations populations becoming more like the nations they destroyed and fled good for the invaded nations?
I don’t like it one bit. I’m just pointing that in using a name alone there is more that should be considered in determing the actual rate of demographic shift. I think it growing by any rate does nothing good for England or any other European nation.
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 7:21 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:11 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Fake news for the trolls.
You’re a liar
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:12 am to Strannix
Well I fully agree that those countries have completely fricked up this particular stat is more of a relic then it is reality. Every third fricking muslim seems to me in their kid Muhammad. White people tend to name their kids a shape or diverse
It would be like if a bunch of Koreans moved to your country suddenly the most common last name your country might be Kim because half the fricking Koreans last name is Kim
It would be like if a bunch of Koreans moved to your country suddenly the most common last name your country might be Kim because half the fricking Koreans last name is Kim
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:16 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Every third fricking muslim seems to me in their kid Muhammad. White people tend to name their kids a shape or diverse
So there being more Mohameds than Johns in London is a misnomer then?
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:19 am to Strannix
quote:
So there being more Mohameds than Johns in London is a misnomer then?
Being born, no. And you can agree it’s bad news while also pointing out there is more to consider regarding how fast the demographic shift is overall
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 7:22 am
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:23 am to el Gaucho
quote:
So, there has been an explosion in the Muslim population.
Cmon man don't be islamophobic. Most of the Muslim population does truck attacks these days
Why do you assume I’m talking about an attack, you racist?
Perhaps I was talking about an increase in size type explosion.
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:29 am to Lsuchs
quote:
Being born, no. And you can agree it’s bad news while also pointing out there is more to consider regarding how fast the demographic shift is overall
I consider it genocide, we can agree to disagree
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:31 am to Strannix
quote:
So there being more Mohameds than Johns in London is a misnomer then
No. I'm simply pointing out that if a group of people name one out of every three babies Muhammad and the most common name in the other group of people is 1 out of 20 of their babies then it won't take long for the first groups baby name to be the most common.
Basic math
Like I said. They most certainly have fricked up by taking in all of these guys. But I'm a numbers guy and I hate when statistics attempt to portray something that they don't actually portray
Posted on 1/25/18 at 7:36 am to Strannix
quote:
we can agree to disagree
I hadn’t disagreed with you in this thread, I raised a question in regards to Muslim naming habits
This post was edited on 1/25/18 at 7:38 am
Popular
Back to top


15







