Started By
Message
locked post

Modly SHOULD get the full time job as Navy Secretary

Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:08 pm
Posted by DyeHardDylan
Member since Nov 2011
7730 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:08 pm
Because of this. But because of this, he won’t, due to politics. You simply don’t allow leaks like this to take place in the military. That’s when it becomes a serious national security issue that jeopardizes the entire ship. There is a chain of command in the military; you don’t go around that to make a point or make yourself the center of attention.
Posted by djmicrobe
Planet Earth
Member since Jan 2007
4970 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 10:39 pm to
Who leaked the letter? Even Trump has been unable to control the leakers. If Modly leaked, then he can not have job permanently because he will need to be removed. If someone else liked, then they need to be removed.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:17 pm to
Doubt it was Modly, the acting SecNav. If you mean the carrier commander that Modly removed, his name is Capt. Brett Crozier, a career Naval Officer with much command experience who had risen to one of the most trusted and respected positions in the U.S. Navy as Captain of a Carrier with over 5000 crew members. Apparently Crozier sent the letter to superior officers, but inadvertently copied the letter to other recipients, and a copy of it eventually reached the media.

Crozier was concerned that he had several crew on his ship who were sick with COVID-19. He was seeking assistance from his superiors - he had a small number of sailors infected with the virus, but testing was irrelevant and quarantine methods were useless with the entire crew embarked on a warship that does not allow for social distancing or isolation.

So Capt. Crozier watched as the virus ripped through his crew. Around 150+ became ill with COVID-19, including the Captain himself.

One thing that confuses me, is that Crozier's superior was on the TR with him at the time he sent out the letter. There hasn't been any reports in the media about that man's thoughts on the issue, or how he and Crozier interacted over the ordeal.

This is what his crew thought of him, as he left the carrier:

LINK
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:50 pm to
Capt. Crozier decided to take his concerns outside his assigned chain of command. Rather than work with his superior or even take the risk to buck that person is completely irresponsible and risked the security of the ship and it's crew.

That's what we needed, the media to get hold and spout to the world due to their own biases that one of our aircraft carriers are compromised. Why? Because frick our servicemembers it's a chance to dunk on this administration. This is a national security issue that should have been dealt with internally. But no, Cpt Crozier decided to act irresponsibly and unbecoming of his command.

Again, there is a good fricking reason why we're preached to about OPSEC. I've sat in command and staff briefings. Health and welfare of troops are classified for a fricking reason. So our enemies don't know when we're weak.

So that's what we want to support now? Don't like how things are going? frick it, let's leak it to the press. Ol Sarge giving you a tough time? Leak it to the press! Don't want to go on a patrol? Leak it! Don't want to do a sea tour? LEAK!

The undisciplined actions he has taken and the undisciplined cheering for him speaks volumes. You're a leader, not a dad. Actions can get your subordinates killed. That's all we needed was one of our aircraft carriers attacked now that our enemies know it had been compromised. Capt Crozier decided not to use the proper channels and paid the price. I feel no sympathy for him.

Edit: Why I feel strongly about this is because I'm sick and fricking tired of officers who are more concerned of their own careers over the men and women who serve under them. I saw this when I was a naive soldier and NCO. I was in when assclowns like Wesley Clark wanted to start a fricking world war over a shitty airport. He knew the proper way to do this. Again, Crozier wanted to be a prima donna and send out a blast email. frick him.

Edit 2: I'm not saying all officers are like this, they're few and far between. Many officers I've served under would also find this reprehensible. They cared about their troops, not being an activist.



This post was edited on 4/7/20 at 12:04 am
Posted by geauxnavybeatbama
Member since Jul 2013
25134 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:53 pm to
I actually really like modly. Since he took over as acting he sends a weekly letter to the navy and marine corps about current and future plans. Never had a secnav do that before. It shows transparency.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64559 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Who leaked the letter?


The Captain sent the letter or email over unsecured channels to people outside of his chain of command. Whichever of them handed it over to the media is immaterial. The leak started with the Captain. He is responsible and must be held accountable.
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 12:02 am to
quote:

he leak started with the Captain. He is responsible and must be held accountable.


From one vet to another...

Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
18841 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:16 am to
quote:


From one vet to another...

...and from another vet also.

Loose emails sinks ships.

No confidence.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19234 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:19 am to
I admire the Navy’s willingness to fire officers.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:40 am to
quote:

The Captain sent the letter or email
Which is why I do not discuss sensitive matters like this is an email. I am empathetic to the captain. He was balancing risk to force with risk to mission. But he displayed tremendous lack of judgement in how he addressed the issue in a nonsecure form of communication.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:53 am to
quote:

Which is why I do not discuss sensitive matters like this is an email. I am empathetic to the captain. He was balancing risk to force with risk to mission. But he displayed tremendous lack of judgement in how he addressed the issue in a nonsecure form of communication.


It is really that simple. That this has become a story is more of interest to me than the story itself.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:56 am to
Only thing that got big navy’s attention was the emails that got leaked. The captain tried the chain of command and when that didn’t work, he went outside of it. Didn’t have time to waste. He basically fell on the sword for his crew.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:58 am to
Disagree. He created a tremendous risk to his crew by revealing their lack of readiness on the high seas.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16098 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 5:54 am to
This is a tough one to get at truly. One the hand there was a serious health concern and everyone in uniform has the right to call “knock it off” if they feel there are unsafe conditions. You also have whistle blower privileges, and a right not to suffer reprisals. None of these seem to have been afforded the Captain.

On the other hand, if it is true he never brought up his grave concerns while on a conference call with his superiors then it is hard to understand his recourse.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:19 pm to
Yeah he made some mistakes but you think he would risk his entire career for shits and giggles? He clearly made the decisions he made because he thought there would be a lot of deaths resulting from this virus on his ship. He didn’t think big navy was getting the message. So he went beyond his chain of command. Mission over people is one thing and opsec etc, but when the choice is have a ton of dead people on the ship you command or speed up the military’s reaction by going outside of the chain, well, it didn’t seem like it was a tough call for him to make.

He literally sacrificed his career over this.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:22 pm to
What is the current morbidity rate of the disease?

That will answer your question.

There were plenty of ways to handle the issue. He chose poorly.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Actions can get your subordinates killed.


The captain chose the well being of his crew over the mission and paid the price. He obviously thought it was worth it.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/21 at 4:56 am
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:28 pm to
Ok boomer
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 4/7/20 at 1:29 pm to
And all I got was a downvote...

Nice.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram