- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/28/18 at 3:30 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
They don’t care about a sign. But they’ll care about what the sign means once they start shooting at unarmed children.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 7:29 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
So tired of morons not capable of any logic. Having someone opening fire on soft targets is somehow better in your weak sick mind.
Is it possible a teacher will hit a student. Yes. But that student is dead if nobody can defend them in a shooting.
You are a weak despicable piece of crap. You only want the government to control all aspects of your life and everyone else. They did a fantastic job with this shooting from the local level all the way up to the FBI.
Go find yourself a nice comfortable communist country to live in.
Is it possible a teacher will hit a student. Yes. But that student is dead if nobody can defend them in a shooting.
You are a weak despicable piece of crap. You only want the government to control all aspects of your life and everyone else. They did a fantastic job with this shooting from the local level all the way up to the FBI.
Go find yourself a nice comfortable communist country to live in.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 3:03 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Laughable
Yet you want only law enforcement to protect everyone?
Posted on 3/1/18 at 3:20 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Just another contrarian shitflinger. Pay it no mind.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 4:00 am to shutterspeed
I've spoken to a few K-12 teachers here locally about it and they have all been against this.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 8:09 am to PaperTiger
quote:
I've spoken to a few K-12 teachers here locally about it and they have all been against this.
So have I, and they are all against because teachers, for the most part, are a bunch of spineless liberal bedwetters.
Yet not one of them can give an answer about what to do once a shooter is on campus. They all believe that somehow shooters will magically disappear if we just took away all the scary looking guns.
So, I've asked: are drugs forbidden on campus? Are drugs ever found on campus?
They just get angry and say, "More guns are not the answer.". They make no distinction between a good guy with a gun and a bad guy with a gun.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 8:12 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Regardless of proof, this seems like a reasonable percentage. Assuming this is correct, does this mean people should not use a gun to protect themselves or others? Do u not think someone shooting at a shooter makes them less likely to hit innocent targets or even start shooting in the first place? Some home protection professionals suggest the best gun for the home is the loudest one. Simply the sound of shots being fired presumably in their direction is enough to scare away the criminal.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 8:13 am to shutterspeed
As a deterrent at least great news. Go Sippi.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 8:15 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Police officers hit on about what 25% of their shots? Can’t wait to see what teachers do!
quote:
Kickadawgitfeelsgood
You hit on about 0% of your posts so your opinion is invalid just like your fake BS about hiring illegals.
Stick to calling into kpel and pretending like you’re important.
Posted on 3/1/18 at 1:13 pm to mtntiger
I agree to an extent which is why I specified my questions to K-12 teachers and not University professors. The teachers I talked to really don't have a political agenda because of the age group they teach.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News