Started By
Message

re: McDaniel grasping at straws, fabricating stats.

Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:32 pm to
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:32 pm to
Childers is a good man. I don't know him but friends of mine do.

But just like McDaniel, he won't be chairman of appropriations if GOP Takes the senate.

Idealogically we agree. But just not now.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 9:34 pm
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:33 pm to
I voted 10 times for Cochran.

There, I said it.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38255 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Childers is a good man. I don't know him but friends of mine do.

Another irony. Had the crossover gotten McDaniels into the general election, Childers would our Senator. Not sure why they didn't understand that.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 9:48 pm
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:41 pm to
*^^^^^^^^**** this. I really wanted to but couldn't.

ETA- McDanial is committing political suicide right now. Outside of jones county.

ETA CAme up way to late in the order of posts. Meant that I agree with most of McDaniel's stated positions but want a shot at appropriations chair.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 10:35 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58094 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:03 am to
Yet no one seems to mind NE Jackson getting out an voting for Melton, Crisler, Lee, Yarber.... you get the idea.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128653 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:10 am to
quote:

I find it funny that people bemoan pork as being the cause of our deficit when the numbers certainly suggest otherwise.

The "pork" isn't the problem. But it is a symptom of the problem. Lobbyists getting their companies special treatment. Giveaways to multinationals. Special treatment for big money donors. Creating policy and legislation based upon the needs of the elite. Those are all tied together with the same twine with pork barrel spending.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128653 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:12 am to
quote:

McDaniel's stated positions but want a shot at appropriations chair.


Then you don't really agree with McDaniel's positions. You're a situational fiscal conservative.
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:26 am to
No. I am really a strict constructionilist but I don't believe that Chris is. Thus my vote for hopefully appropriations chair. What I saw here on the coast from tha ads had nothing to do with theory.

From Chris. Cochran was same old know what you have.
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 12:28 am
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:31 am to
What you true believers on both sides are missing here is there were lots of us not really in either camp. I voted for McDaniel but was split 55-45 or so on my decision. If Thad had won without Barbours bullshite I would have voted down the line come nov. I will never vote for anyone involved with encouraging crossover voting in a runoff. That is a dirty underhanded method of rigging an election in my own opinion. I am not arguing the positions or competance of either man. The rep. party had no business overriding the wishes of the republican voters. Couple this with the man not even planning to serve his term and I and most people I talk to are really unhappy with our state rep. party.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128653 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:47 am to
quote:

Thus my vote for hopefully appropriations chair.

Why?
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 5:17 am to
Serously? We build ships and have military bases here. Appropriations committee could be huge.

ETA - all politics local. Ingalls delivered a bunch for Cochran.
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 5:21 am
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 11:14 am to
So, if any of you ever ran for office and thought there was illegal voting causing you to lose, you wouldn't fight to find out?

Remember, there are lots of family and friends and volunteers who gave a lot. They deserve the truth. He is forced to fight for honesty and a system that is corruption free. He ran his campaign on that "getting away from bad politics".
He, his people, the voters, and all of us Americans deserve the truth.
At minimum, it will shine light on this and stop it from happening elsewhere.

Also, if they are both honest men, wouldn't they BOTH want the truth?
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 11:17 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38255 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

So, if any of you ever ran for office and thought there was illegal voting causing you to lose, you wouldn't fight to find out?

Remember, there are lots of family and friends and volunteers who gave a lot. They deserve the truth. He is forced to fight for honesty and a system that is corruption free. He ran his campaign on that "getting away from bad politics".
He, his people, the voters, and all of us Americans deserve the truth.
At minimum, it will shine light on this and stop it from happening elsewhere.

Also, if they are both honest men, wouldn't they BOTH want the truth?

Who has suggested they didn't want the truth to come out? I just don't think there are enough illegal votes where they voted in the Democratic primary and then in the Republican runoff. And what if there are? You can't throw them out and assume they all voted for Cochran because you can't possibly know voter intent. The alternative is another election. I don't think it would get to that. The fact that many Democrats voted does not make it illegal if they in fact would prefer Thad over Chris. That is their right; regardless of their intentions for November.
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14300 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 1:28 pm to
This is a serious question for the people who love to brag about what Thad has done for Ingalls and all that. Isn't the plant half the size that it was when Thad took office all those years ago? You'd think that government pipeline would allow them to hire more people not fire half their people. Serious question.

If they quit depending on government handouts and just built ships that businesses are actually buying I bet they would start growing again.
Posted by beachreb61
Long Beach, MS
Member since Nov 2009
1715 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 2:09 pm to
Ingalls would be gone if not for Cochran. The northeasterners wanted it all at Bath in Maine.
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Who has suggested they didn't want the truth to come out? I just don't think there are enough illegal votes where they voted in the Democratic primary and then in the Republican runoff. And what if there are? You can't throw them out and assume they all voted for Cochran because you can't possibly know voter intent. The alternative is another election. I don't think it would get to that. The fact that many Democrats voted does not make it illegal if they in fact would prefer Thad over Chris. That is their right; regardless of their intentions for November.


I didn't understand a word you said, Thad's old shriveled cock is slurring your words.

You need to be put in a home. You and your entitled generation have already done enough to hurt this country, and I'm tired of supporting you old senile leaches.
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
18622 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

The fact that many Democrats voted does not make it illegal if they in fact would prefer Thad over Chris.


Do you really believe that these democratic voters got out and voted because they "preferred" Cochran over McDaniel?




That's bullshite and you know it.

You can defend why you think Cochran is a better choice for Mississippi, whether it's appropriations or catfish or Ingalls or whatever... But don't insult the intelligence of knowledgeable and informed Mississippians by pretending that the increase in Democratic votes during the Republican run-off was anything but a coordinated political hi-jacking of an election with national implications.


And if you really do believe the same folks that voted for Chokwe Lumumba came out in droves to vote for Thad Cochran because they like his political positions...then I've got some real-estate in Jones County you may be interested in.



Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 3:03 pm to
Leave the old man alone. He doesn't know what he wants, other than entitlements and what grandpappy Thad tells him he wants.

It's weird how these guys are defending grandpappy Thad just like liberals defend Obozo. I guess when you're getting your welfare you'll defend a politician with your life.

Posted by Don Johnson
Member since Dec 2010
528 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 3:41 pm to
I like the things McDaniel said he stood for. But I don't believe he actually stood for them. And don't believe he had the ability to get any of it remotely accomplished. He was a lightweight in the MS Senate who did nothing that he said he stood for, showed no leadership, and never got anything accomplished.

Face it, he saw a personal opportunity. A vulnerable candidate that was running, and all the quality candidates were on the sidelines out of respect. There would never again be an opportunity like this for a candidate this weak. Say the right things to the fiscal conservatives, and combine then with the folks who like to talk about heritage (cough, cough) and you've got a solid base.

Even if you can't stand Thad, 6 years of him is way better that 30 of lightweight McDaniel.
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4505 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

You and your entitled generation have already done enough to hurt this country, and I'm tired of supporting you old senile leaches.


Care to explain how fellow taxpayers are leaches.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram