Started By
Message

re: Mayors Discuss Ways to Stop Gentrification

Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:46 am to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:

This has resulted in a much lower rate of segregation between the two communities


Compared to blacks? I'll buy that.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:



Don't forget the Chinese though. They REALLY hate them as well.


True - though generally its only when they are on such a blood thirsty rampage that the tiny peninsula of Korea isn't big enough to satisfy them.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423378 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Chinatown? SERIOUSLY? WTF?!?!

chinatown isn't "segregated", as whites don't force asians into that area. that is an area asians choose to live on their own these days

maybe 150 years ago it was forced, but it's not anymore. the asians live there by choice
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 11:49 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423378 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

During the great westward expansion asians were generally treated like shite.

yes they were

and they're doing just fine now, so what happened 150 years ago doesn't really matter today
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:50 am to
quote:


chinatown isn't "segregated", as whites don't force asians into that area.


Its segregation regardless of the cause.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

what happened 150 years ago doesn't really matter today


That sums up your world view very nicely.

Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Allow grandfathering of property owners against increasing property taxes (freeze their rate, or increase at lower rate).

Louisiana freezes the assessment when the homeowner turns 65 if he earns below a certain amount (currently $65K). In practice, no income verification is ever done. The special assessment can be passed on to a surviving spouse.
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
5979 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

segregation




Why is this a bad thing?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423378 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Its segregation regardless of the cause.

so one group choosing to live amongst itself is now "segregation" ?
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27324 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Its segregation regardless of the cause.

Segregation is forced separation... whether direct or indirect.

A group of people choosing to live in a particular area different from others is not segregation.

Now, I don't know if that is the case with Chinatown... but if it is, then it's not segregation.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423378 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

That sums up your world view very nicely.

and it's true, no matter how much you try to argue with the truth

how often do you look back at your family's history from 150 years ago and think about how that affects you today?

i don't think i ever have

how often do you?
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:


so one group choosing to live amongst itself is now "segregation" ?


It has always been. Segregation just means the groups are separate.

The list of the top 25 segregated cities I posted earlier - for instance - does not rank based on cause - but on actual segregation as revealed by population data.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 11:59 am to
quote:


A group of people choosing to live in a particular area different from others is not segregation.


Yes it is. Its voluntary segregation.

Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72177 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Compared to blacks?
Definitely. There are a multitude of reasons why blacks live in disproportionately high black population areas compared to other races.

In the end though, it is more apt to state that these areas are economically segregated, rather than racially. The fact that there is a disproportionate percentage of blacks that are poor is an external factor when discussing current segregation causes/characteristics, IMO.

You may disagree with that though.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Definitely. There are a multitude of reasons why blacks live in disproportionately high black population areas compared to other races.

In the end though, it is more apt to state that these areas are economically segregated, rather than racially. The fact that there is a disproportionate percentage of blacks that are poor is an external factor when discussing current segregation causes/characteristics, IMO.

You may disagree with that though.



That's really only 100% true if you entirely discount the factor racism plays in inhibiting people's ability to rise in economic class.

Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69932 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:03 pm to
So if people choose to live in a community of people who share their ethnicity, it's the same as if people are forced to live in a community of people who share their ethnicity?


Is that what you're saying?
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:


So if people choose to live in a community of people who share their ethnicity, it's the same as if people are forced to live in a community of people who share their ethnicity?


Is that what you're saying?


No.

Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69932 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:05 pm to
Ok, I just wanted to make sure.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72177 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

That's really only 100% true if you entirely discount the factor racism plays in inhibiting people's ability to rise in economic class.
Nothing in this area of sociology is every 100% true or false. It is defined by majority and minority factors at play.

In my personal opinion, the racial factor associated w/ economic advancement is a minority factor, or at least it has become one over time.

Was the racial element initially a majority factor? Definitely.

Did the racial aspect give rise to the many of the current majority factors? Sure.

At this point in time though, the new metastatic aspects of the initial cancer (racial discrimination) have become more deadly, if you catch my drift. The racial discrimination element has largely been subdued by our society. The problem is addressing the issues that arose due to years of discrimination. I have no answers or solutions to that.

Bear in mind, I'm not saying that people aren't racist anymore. That is wholly untrue.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 12:13 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27324 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Yes it is. Its voluntary segregation.

True. By definition it is. But it's not the same as blacks being priced out of an area or laws set up to force segregation. Which was really the point of the discussion.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram