re: MAHA: Child vaccine schedule reduces from 72 jabs to 11

Why is opt out (the current policy) not good enough?

quote:

---

Effective sure... necessary for ALL infants AT BIRTH? No. Should be risk based.

---

Read that report again. The entire thing. If you aren't moved by the facts presented in the link you yourself posted, then you might as well just be a partisan rather than pretending you are interested in the science.

I strongly suspect that your risk analysis skills are overstated and also represent an accurate cross-section of American parents. Your position is a strong argument against relying on the risk intuition of caregivers in favor of a universal approach. It is a case study in a person who seems to lack the ability to hold object permanence.

Looking at the facts, there is literally no evidence other than vibes for a change to our approach. The approach is low-cost, extremely low-risk (despite how many times you insist there is some risk which you have yet been able to name), and has basically obliterated cases for children. You have to present a better argument for your position, as so far it has been among the worst I've ever read.

Let's put this in context. During the time period this was implemented, the US had several drug crises among every demographic in the US, and had a decrease in cases for one disease which was historically associated with drug taking populations. How can anyone look at that and reasonably say we have to change our approach?

I thought lefties wanted us to do things the way they do in Europe.

quote:

---

I know some of the countries are making it so that GMO foods can be passed off as not GMO.

---

Yuck… that stinks. Being tricked by franken-meat is a fear of mine.