- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lolzy....Mueller newest indictment is for DELETED EMAILS?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:41 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:41 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
Mueller has now forced trumpkins to no longer care about deleted emails
Au Contraire. Nobody here is defending the democrat lawyer who worked for Obama's White House Counsel getting popped for deleting emails. The precedent is set. Game is on. Mueller just opened the door.
0
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:44 pm to texridder
quote:
You might find it interesting that Van der Zwaan is the son-in-law of Russian oligarch German Khan. Khan is affiliated with Alfa Bank. You know that's the bank that was mentioned by Steele as a financial institution that Steele's sources claim helped fund Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election.
I think you should probably tread lightly considering the Clintons deep ties with Alfa. The lawyer who is the Ukrainian billionaires son in law worked directly for an attorney who was Obama's White House Counsel in 2009. The right connections for what you are insinuating. Just the wrong "team". Typical dem projection.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 3:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You might find it interesting that Van der Zwaan is the son-in-law of Russian oligarch German Khan. Khan is affiliated with Alfa Bank. You know that's the bank that was mentioned by Steele as a financial institution that Steele's sources claim helped fund Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election.
You also remember that the Trump organization got an email in 2016 that had Alfa bank in the meta data of the sender. Trump's guys explained it away as being junk mail.
quote:
I think you should probably tread lightly considering the Clintons deep ties with Alfa. The lawyer who is the Ukrainian billionaires son in law worked directly for an attorney who was Obama's White House Counsel in 2009. The right connections for what you are insinuating. Just the wrong "team". Typical dem projection.
So you're thinking that fact is compelling in light of the information I posted?
Looks to me like you brought a rubber knife to a gun fight.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:09 pm to texridder
What does the information you posted, mean, Mr gun fight? Stop insinuating and come out with it. Or perhaps use some common friecking sense and realize that perhaps this kid was being interviewed because of who his father in law is and got caught up in a process crime. You conspiracy theorists crack me up.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:20 pm to CptBengal
It came out at Van Der Zwann's plea hearing this afternoon that the unidentified person ("person A") in the indictment lives in Ukraine (so not Manafort). Also, the government made a court filing that Gates had used an encrypted app to send van der Zwaan a preliminary Ukrainian complaint against a Yanukovych minister, Skadden Arps and Manafort. Gates also told van der Zwaan to contact this person A ("a longtime business associate of Manafort & Gates in Ukraine.") 
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:24 pm to TigerDoc
Hmmmm. The Ukraine? Who do we know that has been involved with the Ukraine?
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:27 pm to BBONDS25
You do know why Andrea Chalupa contacted the Ukrainian embassy, don't you, Bonds?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:32 pm to TigerDoc
The HuffPo writer? Oh boy, Doc. You are worse off than I thought.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
perhaps this kid was being interviewed because of who his father in law is and got caught up in a process crime.
You should have quit while you were behind.
Van Der Zwaan was being interviewed because he spoke with Gates and Person A (Manafort??) in September 2016 and sent/received an email to Person A during that same time.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:35 pm to BBONDS25
Heh. Alexandra.
Same question.
Same question.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:36 pm to texridder
Doesn't look like person A can be Manafort (see filing above).
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:43 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Hmmmm. The Ukraine? Who do we know that has been involved with the Ukraine?
In response to quotes from the Plea Agreement about contact with Gates, you counter with
"who do we know that was involved with Ukraine."
You need to stay on this board. You couldn't survive anywhere else.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:44 pm to TigerDoc
I know why she claims she contacted the embassy. I also know the result. DNC collusion with the Ukraine to spread false propaganda against Trump. She should be familiar with Manafort as his time lobbying in the Ukraine was done while working for the Podesta group.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:46 pm to texridder
You have a problem with relevance. As a former prosecutor, I saw it all the time with the uneducated and lower iq people. You don't really understand the proceedings, but you think you have something really important that needs to be heard. Run along youngen. The Doc and I are having grown up conversations.
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:50 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
It came out at Van Der Zwann's plea hearing this afternoon that the unidentified person ("person A") in the indictment lives in Ukraine (so not Manafort). Also, the government made a court filing that Gates had used an encrypted app to send van der Zwaan a preliminary Ukrainian complaint against a Yanukovych minister, Skadden Arps and Manafort. Gates also told van der Zwaan to contact this person A ("a longtime business associate of Manafort & Gates in Ukraine.")
My best guess is Konstantin Kilimnik.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:50 pm to texridder
Some background about Bonds: starting last summer he made multiple predictions that more Democratic-connected folks would be rolled up in the special counsel investigation than Trump associates, and though he's wavered and hedged a couple of times he's more recently given to making tendentious readings of news stories to imply that characters investigated like Van Der Zwann count toward the Clinton count (currently at 0).
This post was edited on 2/20/18 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
As a former prosecutor,
Where? Were't you the one discussing DUI's. That's real upper echelon legal theory, there.
Another of your useless replies that doesn't address anything that was actually posted.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:52 pm to gthog61
Target is Hillary dip shite. Take it easy.
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:52 pm to Decatur
So does this latest indictment have anything to do with Trump-Russia-Election 2016?
Posted on 2/20/18 at 4:53 pm to texridder
quote:
Were't you the one discussing DUI's
Don't think so.
quote:
Another of your useless replies that doesn't address anything that was actually posted.
As I mentioned. There isn't anything to reply to. Your posts are not relevant. If you have an accusation make it.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News