Started By
Message

re: Lindsay Clancy's case should take care of any chance of having a woman POTUS

Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:59 am to
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9600 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:59 am to
No, the Democrat Socialist crowd would actually endorse Lindsay for POTUS.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6647 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

parts of the Democratic Party are quietly rallying behind Jon Ossoff. By the standards the party has promoted in recent years, he shouldn’t even be a choice. He’s a young, straight white man with an average, skinny white wife and two daughters, and he’s not a communist.

He's a piece of spaghetti they're throwing against the wall to see if it sticks. Checking to see how many of their conservatives or moderates go to him. If they numbers are high enough, they will ramp up their indoctrination harder.
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5700 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

What office is Lindsay Clancy running for?



You're an idiot if you can't follow along. I see why you get a lot of downvotes.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29285 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Has testosterone imbalances ever been successfully used as a legal defense in court?

Like for speeding, assault, rape, murder, etc?


I'll take that as a no.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6647 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Anyone thinking the Lindsay Clancy trial is some sort of preview of female leadership is a moron. Any “lesson” here could be applied to anyone.

The ridiculously dumb counts that were out on the streets for her, and all over the internet for her have cut themselves off at both feet.
And they dragged half their gender down with them.

You wanna snap at us. But we are just a symptom. The problem, they brought on themselves, and upon others of their gender.
The problem, is that the modern woman, and the modern feminists have gone too radical to be trusted.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6647 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Alcoholism is a disease. Why should we convict men who get drunk and beat their wives? It’s not their fault they have a disease

I'm at least a 3rd generation alcoholic. My biological father was a physical abusive drunk to my biological mother.
I saw the bitch with another man and I reverted to my genes. Can I go home now, your honor?
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6647 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Ahh I see. You are either retarded or being purposely obtuse.

Your Tate example is a bad one. So was your Dahmer one. Keep trying, though.



I'm thinking Hater is a female.
Probly that time of the month.
Offended about talk of hormonal excuses.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
6647 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Let’s not forget that at least one, presumably more, jurors are not willing to convict her

Most likely, the same one(s) who shouldn't have been trusted with confidentiality, and leaked the case in the first place.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
37102 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Using your logic, why wouldn’t any of the heinous crimes committed by men (who commit the overwhelming majority of all violent and sexual crimes globally across world history) prohibit them from holding positions of power?
Accountability. I know it's a foreign concept for you so you should look into it.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram