- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let me see if I’m understanding this situation...
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:28 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:28 am
From what I’ve heard and read, this is my understanding of the situation. Please correct me if I’m off base.
Democrats are saying that without absolute proof of the Biden allegations then it’s a moot point and obviously false. However asking for that proof from the government of the country where the corruption occurred is soliciting election interference from a foreign government because the accused is a candidate.
However, back in 2016 when Obama discussed Trump with foreign governments, well that was different.
Am I close?
Democrats are saying that without absolute proof of the Biden allegations then it’s a moot point and obviously false. However asking for that proof from the government of the country where the corruption occurred is soliciting election interference from a foreign government because the accused is a candidate.
However, back in 2016 when Obama discussed Trump with foreign governments, well that was different.
Am I close?
3
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:29 am to Jeff Boomhauer
quote:
From what I’ve heard and read, this is my understanding of the situation. Please correct me if I’m off base.
Democrats are saying that without absolute proof of the Biden allegations then it’s a moot point and obviously false. However asking for that proof from the government of the country where the corruption occurred is soliciting election interference from a foreign government because the accused is a candidate.
However, back in 2016 when Obama discussed Trump with foreign governments, well that was different.
Am I close?
There is actually proof that Biden interfered in a foreign government's legal system. He admitted it.
For what purpose hasn't been determined.
But there's more proof than not that he acted nefariously.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:31 am to Jeff Boomhauer
People who investigate crimes are the criminals.
People who commit crimes are the victims.
HONK HONK
People who commit crimes are the victims.
HONK HONK
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:33 am to Jeff Boomhauer
well they did bitch about corruption for 3 years, and then our god-emperor asked for an investigation into corruption and they fliptheFuk out
So you might say that they're inconsistent
So you might say that they're inconsistent
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News