- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lesbian Couple Posts Bloody Photo After Four 'Hooligans' Beat Them For Not Kissing
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:12 am to Jorts R Us
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:12 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
I specified there are some resident posters who will have difficulty wrapping their heads around a condemnation of a Muslim attack by a Muslim.
Unless the mayor makes it a point to say they were Muslims, he is not condemning a “Muslim attack”. He is simply condemning an attack on 2 women. What kind of mayor wouldn’t condemn that?
No points awarded
2
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:21 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
Unless the mayor makes it a point to say they were Muslims, he is not condemning a “Muslim attack”. He is simply condemning an attack on 2 women. What kind of mayor wouldn’t condemn that? No points awarded
Undoubtedly, if it was Muslims, his position would be that it was not an attack based on his religion, but an attack by perpetrators who happened to be Muslim. So, yeah, he wouldn't be likely to make Islam as a whole own the attack.
The point is that, if it was Muslims, he didn't just brush this off because it didn't fit a convenient narrative for him. Like I said, quite the conundrum for some posters.
This post was edited on 6/9/19 at 8:24 am
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:35 am to Jorts R Us
It became a huge news story, the mayor of the city couldn’t ignore it, he had to comment on it. Of course there is only one way to respond, he has to condemn it.
IF it was muslim teens who did it, and the media and mayor never mentions it was Muslims (which neither has), then the posters you are talking about will be proven right.
IF it was muslim teens who did it, and the media and mayor never mentions it was Muslims (which neither has), then the posters you are talking about will be proven right.
This post was edited on 6/9/19 at 8:40 am
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:36 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
he had to comment on it.
Yeah but its the new modern norm for London so Sadiq has already excused his fellow extremists
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:40 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
IF it was muslim teens who did it, and the media and mayor never mentions it was Muslims (which neither has), than the posters you are talking about will be proven right.
No one is questioning that the media has a tendency to withhold such descriptions in these instances. Not an argument I'm making.
quote:
It became a huge news story, the mayor of the city couldn’t ignore it, he had to comment on it. Of course there is only one way to respond, he has to condemn it.
Which still presents the conundrum I've referred to.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:43 am to Jorts R Us
Did the muzzie mayor condemn violence against gays or muzzie violence against gays?
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:44 am to Jorts R Us
quote:
Which still presents the conundrum I've referred to
No it doesn’t
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:47 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
No it doesn’t
Sure it does. And it's in line with other pro-gay tweets he's made that we're not "required" due to media scrutiny. That in itself is another conundrum for those posters.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:47 am to Rebel
quote:
Did the muzzie mayor condemn violence against gays or muzzie violence against gays?
Addressed a few posts up.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:53 am to Jorts R Us
So he just condemned violence in general.
He hasn’t specifically condemned domestic Islamic terrorists?
He has in the past specifically defended Islamic attacks as being “part and parcel”.
Not trying to be obtuse, but I don’t see a “conundrum” as you call it.
He hasn’t specifically condemned domestic Islamic terrorists?
He has in the past specifically defended Islamic attacks as being “part and parcel”.
Not trying to be obtuse, but I don’t see a “conundrum” as you call it.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:57 am to Rebel
quote:
Not trying to be obtuse, but I don’t see a “conundrum” as you call it.
That’s because there is no “conundrum” there. He is either too dumb to see that are just refuses to admit he is wrong.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:59 am to Lgrnwd
quote:
Unless the mayor makes it a point to say they were Muslims, he is not condemning a “Muslim attack”. He is simply condemning an attack on 2 women. What kind of mayor wouldn’t condemn that?
No points awarded
Exactly. The mayor has to comment on it, but he'll do it in the softest way possible if the perps are of the immigrant or muslim variety.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News