- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers on here please answer this question for me
Posted on 9/29/19 at 10:27 pm to KevinFaulkDaGawd
Posted on 9/29/19 at 10:27 pm to KevinFaulkDaGawd
This isn’t a court hearing. The issue is whether it’s true. They will examine all available evidence.
2
Posted on 9/29/19 at 10:30 pm to TBoy
Senate Majority Leader can allow or disallow hearsay. It's glorious.
**By calling for a vote of whatever the proposal may be, simple majority rules.
**By calling for a vote of whatever the proposal may be, simple majority rules.
This post was edited on 9/29/19 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 9/29/19 at 10:40 pm to TBoy
quote:And the only “evidence” is the transcripts of the call, and nowhere in the transcripts does Trump discuss quid pro quo.
This isn’t a court hearing. The issue is whether it’s true. They will examine all available evidence.
Schifforbrains won’t be able to play “make believe” and tell us what he thinks the conversation meant by reading between the lines.
“Uh, your honor, I know this is what the transcripts say, but this is what I think they say.” Yeah, that shite ain’t gonna fly.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:15 am to bhtigerfan
The rule of thumb is, if the judge wants to hear it, it’s not hearsay. Impeachment is not a legal process,it is a political process.
The whole thing is crazy but I can’t see it being stopped. He will be impeached and tried in the senate where he will prevail, and be re-elected.
The whole thing is crazy but I can’t see it being stopped. He will be impeached and tried in the senate where he will prevail, and be re-elected.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 3:27 am to bhtigerfan
quote:It won't be just that one call. It will be all the calls between Trump and Zelensky.And calls made by Giuliani. And notes of Giuliani's meeting in Spain. And communications regarding the withholding of the aid.
And the only “evidence” is the transcripts of the call, and nowhere in the transcripts does Trump discuss quid pro quo.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 5:20 am to KevinFaulkDaGawd
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:53 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 5:35 am to KevinFaulkDaGawd
quote:
Is there any way that hearsay is allowed?
Somehow someway and by complete coincidence, Congress changed the rules a couple of weeks prior to this bullshite coming out.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 5:37 am to texridder
quote:
It won't be just that one call. It will be all the calls between Trump and Zelensky.And calls made by Giuliani. And notes of Giuliani's meeting in Spain. And communications regarding the withholding of the aid.
Bring it on.....along with all the communications
involving Biden, Obama and the rest of their merry crew.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:44 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
And the only “evidence” is the transcripts of the call, and nowhere in the transcripts does Trump discuss quid pro quo.
Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a [future] meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call or meeting was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".
Why would you expect it in the actual transcript?
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 6:46 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News