- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: L Todd Wood interviews Patrick Byrne "We captured the packets"
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:04 pm to Chet Donnely
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:04 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:All you post is general horseshite, like this. How come you won't post anything specific?
I see your self awareness is still running at an all time high.
1
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:12 pm to texridder
quote:
And you're FOS. Did I run away when you posted that B.S. picture and claimed that Repub poll watchers were being blocked out from viewing vote counting
You sure did. And here you are denying evidence
Unless it's in a form of a Russian Dossier you wont believe anything
You are a pathetic liar and a fraud
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:16 pm to texridder
quote:
you post is general horseshite, like this. How come you won't post anything specific?
his point flew right over your head, dummy. He is specifically calling you a chicken shite. 
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:17 pm to CaTiger85
It doesn’t matter if they have a mountain of evidence- the media won’t report it
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:43 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
his point flew right over your head, dummy. He is specifically calling you a chicken shite.
Thank you. Clearly dumb shite can be added to the list.
Posted on 6/7/21 at 5:32 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
It doesn’t matter if they have a mountain of evidence- the media won’t report it
I don't believe truth is determined by whether or not the media reports it.
Posted on 6/7/21 at 10:10 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
his point flew right over your head, dummy. He is specifically calling you a chicken shite.
His point flew right over my head because he didn't have a point.
He was just posting shite because that is all he knows.
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:08 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
Another 'straw'. Can't hurt.
It will ultimately break the jackass's back.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:32 am to CaTiger85
quote:
You ignore the fact that even if you adjust what you take issue with, it is still a one in a few billion chance of happening statistically.
You obviously don't appreciate what the ridiculous assumption Cicchetti made to come up with his billion to one idiocy.
The way he got to a billion to one is Cicchetti assumed that the Rep/Dem vote split in GA after 3:00 a.m. on Nov 4 would be the same as the Rep/Dem vote split was before 3:00 a.m.
He did that even though the majority of outstanding votes at 3:00 a.m. was in Democratic areas and/or was mail-in (likely Democratic) ballots.
This is how Cicchetti justified making his assumption:
quote:[Cicchetti Declaration Para. 16.]
I am aware of anecdotal statements from election night that some Democrat strongholds were yet to be tabulated. There was also some speculation that the yet-to-be counted ballots were likely absentee mail-in ballots. Either could cause the latter ballots to be non-randomly different than the nearly 95% of ballots counted by 3AM EST, but I am not aware of any actual data supporting that either of these events occurred.
Do you realize that Cicchetti's calculation was useless because his assumption was absurd?
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:49 am to SDVTiger
quote:
And you're FOS. Did I run away when you posted that B.S. picture and claimed that Repub poll watchers were being blocked out from viewing vote counting.
quote:
You sure did. And here you are denying evidence.
You're a POS liar. I didn't run away.
This is the link (With an article and video) that I posted to disprove your poll watcher horseshite. LINK
You are such a pathetic loser.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:55 am to texridder
Shut up, bitch.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:10 am to the808bass
quote:
Shut up, bitch.
You are such a pathetic loser, too.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:22 am to texridder
I don’t lie about who I am on the internet. So there’s that.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:28 am to the808bass
quote:do you think I should take your word on that?
I don’t lie about who I am on the internet.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 7:01 am to texridder
quote:
His point flew right over my head because he didn't have a point. He was just posting shite because that is all he knows.
No, dummy. He literally posted the same exact thing you did. You missed the point and then whined by saying what he was doing was “posting shite”, which is hilarious since he basically regurgitated your posts.
Do you not see this? My God you are slow.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 7:05 am to texridder
quote:
The way he got to a billion to one is Cicchetti
Dummy. Cichetti got to four quadrillion to one. Idiot. That’s why I said even if you adjust for all of this:
quote:
assumed that the Rep/Dem vote split in GA after 3:00 a.m. on Nov 4 would be the same as the Rep/Dem vote split was before 3:00 a.m.
It would still make it a several billion to one shot. That was precisely my point in my original post you moron. You know….when I wrote this:
quote:
We’ve done this dance. You take umbrage with the methodology of the one in quadrillion study. You ignore the fact that even if you adjust what you take issue with, it is still a one in a few billion chance of happening statistically. If you think that is not prime facie evidence it is because you don’t know what prime facie evidence is.
How did you miss that? Should I type it more slowly. Idiot.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:58 am to CaTiger85
quote:
You take umbrage with the methodology of the one in quadrillion study. You ignore the fact that even if you adjust what you take issue with, it is still a one in a few billion chance of happening statistically.
You're wrong. And you're an a-hole.
Cicchetti GA calculation was the basis of his 4 bllion number. Cicchetti was wrong about Georgia and he extrapolated his flawed GA result to the other 3 states to get to 4 billion. How did you miss that DUMMY?
Cicchetti also calculated what the vote in GA had to be after 3:00 a.m. in order for Biden to get the number of votes he received.
quote:[ Cicchetti Declaration, Para. 14]
14. At 3:10AM EST on November 4 the Georgia reported tabulations were 51.09% for Trump and 48.91% for Biden. The total votes reported for the two major candidates were 4,662,328. On November 18 at 2 PM EST, the reported percentages were Trump 49.86% and Biden at 50.14%. The Biden advantage over Trump in the final tabulations reported was less than 14,000 votes, or 0.28%. For this turnaround to occur, the subsequent additional "late" ballots totaling 268,204 votes (5.4% of the votes reported on November 18) had to split 71.60% for Biden and 28.40% for Trump. The two periods report shifts in the percentage favoring Trump from 51.09% to 49.86%, which is a percentage difference of 1.23%.
So you think that the odds of the after 3:00 a.m. vote in GA going 71.60% for Biden was a billion to one, DUMMY?
Try to hide your ignorance better next time. And your misplaced arrogance.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:40 pm to texridder
quote:
You're wrong. And you're an a-hole.
quote:
You are such a pathetic loser, too.
quote:
You're a POS liar.
Self awareness. Look it the frick up you little bitch. Or don't. Watching someone as stupid as you cry all day like a helpless little twat is tiresome but also amusing.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:53 pm to texridder
quote:
So you think that the odds of the after 3:00 a.m. vote in GA going 71.60% for Biden was a billion to one, DUMMY? Try to hide your ignorance better next time. And your misplaced arrogance.
you don’t understand what you’re reading. He said one in 4 quadrillion not 4 billion you ignorant idiot. I am saying that even if you adjust the quadrillion number because you disagree with his methodology it is still a statistical impossibility. You can’t grasp that because you’re a moron. Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:01 pm to texridder
95% of the state went to trump by a little less than 51%, but the last 200k votes or so counted went 76% to Biden? That is a statistical impossibility. Is it one in a billion? One in a quadrillion? Doesn’t matter. It’s a statistical impossibility. Your attempts to obfuscate don’t change the facts, and math doesn’t care about your fragile little feelings.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 1:03 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News