- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: L Todd Wood interviews Patrick Byrne "We captured the packets"
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:47 pm to CaTiger85
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:47 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
you don’t understand what you’re reading. He said one in 4 quadrillion not 4 billion you ignorant idiot. I am saying that even if you adjust the quadrillion number because you disagree with his methodology it is still a statistical impossibility. You can’t grasp that because you’re a moron.
Yep he did say quadrillion.
But that doesn't change the fact that you didn't realize that his error in the GA number affected his 4 quadrillion calculation.
And you did't even address the fact that Cicchetti figured that Biden could have received the vote he did if he got 71.6% of the votes after 3:00 a.m.
Do you think the probability of Biden getting 71.6% of the vote after 3:00 a.m. was as low as billion to one?
That's an easy yes or no question. But of course you won't answer it.
2
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:48 pm to texridder
quote:
But of course you won't answer it.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 2:15 pm to texridder
quote:
Do you think the probability of Biden getting 71.6% of the vote after 3:00 a.m. was as low as billion to one? That's an easy yes or no question. But of course you won't answer it.
Whether it’s a billion or a quadrillion doesn’t matter. It’s a statistical impossibility.
Just because you don’t like my answer, doesn’t mean it’s not an answer, you simpleton.
Math doesn’t agree with you. Sorry little fella.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 2:31 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
Do you think the probability of Biden getting 71.6% of the vote after 3:00 a.m. was as low as billion to one? That's an easy yes or no question. But of course you won't answer it.
quote:
Whether it’s a billion or a quadrillion doesn’t matter. It’s a statistical impossibility.
More bad news for you jackal. Hillary Clinton got 71.6% of the vote in Fulton County in 2016.
Care to reconsider your answer?
Posted on 6/8/21 at 2:38 pm to texridder
quote:
More bad news for you jackal. Hillary Clinton got 71.6% of the vote in Fulton County in 2016. Care to reconsider your answer?
Nope. I’ll go with the world renowned mathematician. Not a proven liar that illegally plays lawyer online that can’t seem to ever ever post a source for her claims. What happened was a statistical impossibility. The science is settled and the experts agree.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:41 pm to CaTiger85
quote:If you weren't such a dumbass I'd take exception to your illegal lawyer bullshite.
Not a proven liar that illegally plays lawyer online that can’t seem to ever ever post a source for her claims.
quote:Really now. Why don't you post a link to where it says that the science is settled on this and the experts agree.
The science is settled and the experts agree.
And, if that's true, I don't understand why you didn't specifically address the fact that Cicchetti said in his declaration that Biden would have had to get 71.6% of the votes after 3:00 a.m. on the 4th for him to get the number of votes he got in in GA, and the fact that Hillary Clinton got 71.6% of the vote in Fulton County in 2016.
That just doesn't sound like a billion to one shot, does it?
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:48 pm to texridder
Trump won.
By alot.
By alot.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News