- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge blocks Trump administration WeChat ban
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:16 pm
quote:
A U.S. judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s order to ban WeChat downloads in the U.S., which was set to start Sunday evening.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco ruled early Sunday that the group of U.S. WeChat users challenging the order raised “serious questions” about how the action would affect their First Amendment rights, Reuters reported.
"The plaintiffs' evidence reflects that WeChat is effectively the only means of communication for many in the community, not only because China bans other apps, but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat," Beeler wrote, according to CNN Business.
She wrote that the order burdens “substantially more speech than is necessary to serve the government’s significant interest in national security, especially given the lack of substitute channels for communication.”
Beeler added that “obvious alternatives” to a ban on downloads of Chinese app across the U.S. exist, including prohibiting the app on government-issued phones.
“Certainly, the government’s overarching national-security interest is significant,” she said. “But on this record — while the government has established that China’s activities raise significant national security concerns — it has put in scant little evidence that its effective ban of WeChat for all U.S. users addresses those concerns.”
LINK
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:18 pm to jatilen
quote:
U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco
Weird
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:18 pm to jatilen
San Francisco
There is a shocker.
There is a shocker.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:19 pm to jatilen
A fricking magistrate judge blocking that? LOL
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:20 pm to jatilen
quote:
Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:21 pm to Malik Agar
quote:
A fricking magistrate judge blocking that? LOL
The Administration needs to stop following these orders. Force the issue. Get some legislation passed that brings some sanity to the process.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:30 pm to jatilen
quote:
"The plaintiffs' evidence reflects that WeChat is effectively the only means of communication for many in the community, not only because China bans other apps, but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat," Beeler wrote, according to CNN Business.
how did this community survive before smartphones?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:36 pm to jatilen
What's that, Judge Beeler? Your account balance is $0? Your 401k is empty? You now have 30 felony convictions on your record? That must really SUCK?
She really said this on the record? Google Translate anyone?
quote:
but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat,"
She really said this on the record? Google Translate anyone?
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:36 pm to jatilen
No way this judge was appointed by a Democrat
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:38 pm to fatboydave
quote:
No way this judge was appointed by a Democrat
On January 4, 2010, Beeler was appointed as a U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of California.[1]
shocking ain't it?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:40 pm to jatilen
No, let's see the judge enforce it
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:43 pm to jatilen
frick off, not being able to download something cannot and will never be an issue of you right to free speech since its not about speech, its only about wanting access to content
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:45 pm to jatilen
Is this judge trying to claim that the ability to communicate with people in China is covered under the first amendment?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News