Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Judge blocks Trump administration WeChat ban

Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:16 pm
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:16 pm
quote:

A U.S. judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s order to ban WeChat downloads in the U.S., which was set to start Sunday evening.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco ruled early Sunday that the group of U.S. WeChat users challenging the order raised “serious questions” about how the action would affect their First Amendment rights, Reuters reported.

"The plaintiffs' evidence reflects that WeChat is effectively the only means of communication for many in the community, not only because China bans other apps, but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat," Beeler wrote, according to CNN Business.

She wrote that the order burdens “substantially more speech than is necessary to serve the government’s significant interest in national security, especially given the lack of substitute channels for communication.”

Beeler added that “obvious alternatives” to a ban on downloads of Chinese app across the U.S. exist, including prohibiting the app on government-issued phones.

“Certainly, the government’s overarching national-security interest is significant,” she said. “But on this record — while the government has established that China’s activities raise significant national security concerns — it has put in scant little evidence that its effective ban of WeChat for all U.S. users addresses those concerns.”


LINK
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71482 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco


Weird
Posted by WhitewaterDawg
Tennessee
Member since Aug 2011
7233 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:18 pm to
San Francisco

There is a shocker.
Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:19 pm to
A fricking magistrate judge blocking that? LOL
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99134 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco


Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
17916 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

A fricking magistrate judge blocking that? LOL

The Administration needs to stop following these orders. Force the issue. Get some legislation passed that brings some sanity to the process.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

"The plaintiffs' evidence reflects that WeChat is effectively the only means of communication for many in the community, not only because China bans other apps, but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat," Beeler wrote, according to CNN Business.


how did this community survive before smartphones?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80294 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:36 pm to
What's that, Judge Beeler? Your account balance is $0? Your 401k is empty? You now have 30 felony convictions on your record? That must really SUCK?

quote:

but also because Chinese speakers with limited English proficiency have no options other than WeChat,"


She really said this on the record? Google Translate anyone?
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 12:37 pm
Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:36 pm to
No way this judge was appointed by a Democrat
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

No way this judge was appointed by a Democrat



On January 4, 2010, Beeler was appointed as a U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of California.[1]

shocking ain't it?
Posted by Presidio
Member since Nov 2017
3060 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:40 pm to
No, let's see the judge enforce it

Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30065 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:43 pm to
frick off, not being able to download something cannot and will never be an issue of you right to free speech since its not about speech, its only about wanting access to content
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 12:44 pm
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4568 posts
Posted on 9/20/20 at 12:45 pm to
Is this judge trying to claim that the ability to communicate with people in China is covered under the first amendment?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram