re: Jindal suckered once again by startup???

quote:

---

I can't believe Moret looked at that site, their tiny rented offices, their history and decided he would commit to pay these guys potentially millions of taxpayer dollars.

---

Will you admit that it is likely Moret knows more about the company than you do? Which is more likely, company paying reasonable salaries and generating revenues or paying obscene salaries with little to no revenue?

quote:

---

I B Freeman, after reading your threads and arguments, you may be the most intellectually dishonest poster on this board. You are the worst at telling one side of the story and leaving out pertinent details on purpose

---

I post numbers and facts and you people do is say "jindal is good" and "film tax credits are not subsidies" and a start up with no apparent revenue "is a great investment of taxpayer money".

I wish there was just one intelligent, accurate, fact filled response to any of my post about the cost of film tax credits or the start up or to Jindal's abuse of his office to impose executive orders to change laws.

You guys are so weak in your arguments supporting Jindal it would embarrass him to read your posts.

I can't help what Jindal is doing but any conservative, small government advocate that calls me intellectually dishonest is just ignorant.

There is nothing small government or fiscally conservative about the Jindal administration record.

You are welcome to tell the other side of any story you wish to tell. Point to any of my threads and arguments that you feel are dishonest. I dare you.