- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith targeted then-House Speaker McCarthy’s private phone records in J6 probe
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Except, I've said the opposite.
The very first time that a thread appeared on this board stating that Jack Smith was being investigated, you swooped in and immediately referred to it as "Political Theatre."
You know you did. Don't deny it.
3
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:57 am to KCT
Jack Smith was Garland and Obama’s street thug. They made him do all the dirty work. All three need to be held accountable for the shite they did.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:58 am to KCT
SFP is personally invested in getting Trump thru any means whether legally or illegally. That’s why nobody here takes him seriously
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:59 am to KCT
quote:
The very first time that a thread appeared on this board stating that Jack Smith was being investigated, you swooped in and immediately referred to it as "Political Theatre."
There is a lot of political theater going on re: Jack Smith
See: This thread
See also: how nobody can articulate a crime even when prompted/asked 4-5 times.
quote:
You know you did. Don't deny it.
Do you understand how English works or is dishonesty your default/
You quoted language that involved 3 examples and than there was another sentence distinguishing Jack Smith. You quote the language, ignore the 3 examples, and then apply the quoted language to Jack Smith, ignoring me plainly saying you've failed to allege a crime for him.
You're proving my points both about your dishonesty/lack of rhetoric AND the political theater involved in discussing Jack Smith and you don't even realize it
Posted on 11/13/25 at 11:59 am to texag7
quote:
SFP is personally invested in getting Trump thru any means whether legally or illegally.
Why do y'all just make shite up and lie?
Update: none of this is true.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’re personally invested in getting Trump and everyone knows it.
I don’t even want to know your private thoughts on Butler Pennsylvania
I don’t even want to know your private thoughts on Butler Pennsylvania
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:02 pm to KCT
quote:Every village needs one.
Do you enjoy being a useful idiot? It seems like you do.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why wouldn’t he? He was conducting an investigation. Are personal phones off limits? Drug dealers will be thrilled to hear this
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:03 pm to texag7
quote:
You’re personally invested in getting Trump and everyone knows it.
But...I'm not.
Take J6. I just with Trump had come out publicly to tell everyone how utterly stupid J6 was, to go home, and there would be no illegal thwarting of the certification of the election.
He chose the opposite and to flame the flames of unintelligence. That doesn't mean that I want to "get" him. I just wish he had not acted like a retard.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:05 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
Why wouldn’t he? He was conducting an investigation. Are personal phones off limits? Drug dealers will be thrilled to hear this
Exactly. This is SOP.
And for the he only subpoenaed one party crowd, how many Democrat politicians were supporting/promoting the J6 nonsense or coordinating with people working the J6 stupidity behind the scenes? I would imagine that's a hard 0. If so, why would Democrats be investigated?
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
How many verbal hoops do you jump thru in a typical day? By now, you just might hold the Guinness World Book record for that.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Keep taking these notes friend. You might learn something about conviction.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes, it’s standard procedure to spy on the victims of a crime. Just the ones you don’t like though.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:10 pm to KCT
quote:
How many verbal hoops do you jump thru in a typical day?
Says the person just busted for being completely dishonest
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Yes, it’s standard procedure to spy on the victims of a crime.
See this is the power of a straw man, in real time.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Dem prosecutors spying on politicians they don’t like and leaking has become the SOP sadly.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Klinesmith was prosecuted for that already.
the guy that didn’t spend a minute in jail and regained his law license after a vacation? The same guy that committed the heinous act of trying to tamper with an election that the left was wanting people in front of firing squads for in 2021?
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
spying
Dishonest framing
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:34 pm to texag7
quote:
SFP says this is good and normal
He also says that this happened years ago. It’s old news. Let it go.
Posted on 11/13/25 at 12:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody is above the law.
An illegitimate special prosecutor sought the communication records of 20% of the opposition party's membership in the House of Representatives. The same body that has oversight responsibilities over the executive. That is an egregious violation of the seperation of powers and regardless of the fact some corrupt judge signed off on it, I don't think absolute immunity applies here.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News