- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a secular argument against abortions?
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:10 pm to westerntigerfan
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:10 pm to westerntigerfan
quote:
Why are you arguing with someone with whom you agree?
I argued a specific point, not your position.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Sure, but morality isn't necessary to show why we shouldn't make rape, theft, and murder legal. I think that was OP's point. Maybe not.
That is definitely part of my point. The majority of people who argue against abortion use morality or outrageous analogies. Although, to be fair, the majority of people who argue for abortion tend to use the "it's my body" argument.
I actually think there IS a secular argument against abortion, not that it means it should necessarily be illegal.
1) It's killing. A heart is stopping, and a living organism is dying. That doesn't make it murder, but it is killing.
2) It is killing a human, if we are talking genetics.
So a human life form is being killed, and in all cases where humans kill other humans there is regulation and discussion.
So, I guess I really made no stance, except to say that I think most of the arguing that typically goes on is dumb.
ETA I accidentally hit submit in the beginning and had to edit this in chunks. Oops.
This post was edited on 5/3/17 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:11 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Have you EVER seen me argue absolutes in terms of abortion all the way back to conception?
That's irrelevant. I didn't make the statement based on your arguement. Congrats. It changes nothing.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:13 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:You said it ALWAYS becomes absolute.
That's irrelevant. I didn't make the statement based on your arguement. Congrats. It changes nothing.
ALWAYS.
Do you have some unique definition you use for the word always?
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
You gave an example of how something can be justified as illegal sans a moral component?
That isn't what was asked.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
You said it ALWAYS becomes absolute.
Correct, I said "the argument," not "your argument."
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:14 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I've asked it several times.
That isn't what was asked.
But hey. Let's pretend I didn't.
Now, it's asked.
Answer?
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I've asked it several times.
Not in that line. Follow it back.
quote:
Answer?
Well, yes.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:15 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Oh. So, you're holding everyone involved in an abortion argument to the standard of the biggest most extreme.
Correct, I said "the argument," not "your argument."
Yeah. That's just goofy.
That means that all pro-choice arguments devolve into being OK with murdering babies after they fall out because SOME pro-choice people think that.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:16 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Answer?
Well, yes.
OK. Then please do so.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:17 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
So, you're holding everyone involved in an abortion argument to the standard of the biggest most extreme.
Nope.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Welp..
We're 6 pages in.
You're still not interested in actual discussion.
We're 6 pages in.
You're still not interested in actual discussion.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:18 pm to ShortyRob
I've already answered that question. You had some follow-up questions, I believe.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Well. I was interested in discussion. I made a legit attempt.
I've already answered that question. You had some follow-up questions, I believe.
That makes one of us.
Out.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:19 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
You're still not interested in actual discussion.
No, I am, but I'm not interested in listening to your assumptions. I'll also not allow words to be put in my mouth.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I made a legit attempt.
You have some catching up to do after your meltdown the other day.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:21 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I asked for examples several times and specifically avoided assuming what your examples would be.
No, I am, but I'm not interested in listening to your assumptions. I'll also not allow words to be put in my mouth.
It didn't matter.
You were more interested in word games. As always.
Now, I get it. That's really your whole point in any thread but hey, I felt like giving it a shot.
But, we'll finish with you achieving the same goal you are always chasing.
Running in circles until the other poster calls it a day.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:22 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Nope.
You have some catching up to do after your meltdown the other day.
It would be more wise for me to just remember the truth of it.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:23 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I argued a specific point, not your position.
I don't find the word "wrong" to be an effective argument against either a point or an position. If you want to go down an argumentative rabbit hole, I choose not to follow you.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:26 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Out.
Guess not.
quote:
I asked for examples several times and specifically avoided assuming what your examples would be.
You aren't the only poster in the discussion. I explained to you that we'd get to it. You didn't like that answer, but you should know that I don't care about that.
Now, you want to frick around because you're special in some threads that you still haven't pointed to.
You'll get a discussion, but it might not be on your terms. Deal with it.
Popular
Back to top



1



