Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is calling a politician "pragmatic" now an insult?

Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:42 am
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
322 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:42 am
In gentler, more unified times in this country, there was no higher praise for an elected official than that he was "pragmatic". That meant that he was able to work with those he had disagreements with to reach a solution to a problem. He was not so entrenched in ideology that reasonable compromise was impossible.

Now the standard seems to be how ideologically pure and rigid you are. Graham was a pragmatist in many ways and those on the post-neocon right never trusted him. Fetterman for all his weirdness is a pragmatist Dem and the left despises him.

Is the hate deserved? Is ideological purity the way to go?
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
7148 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:53 am to
Well, we used to have 2 sides that loved America. Now we have one side whose entire platform is the dismantling of the country. To work with the dems is to work toward destroying this country.
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 11:54 am
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124226 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 11:55 am to
1992 Bill Clinton would be considered to be an ultra MAGA Republican by today’s left. What is there to work together on?
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
322 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Well, we used to have 2 sides that loved America. Now we have one side whose entire platform is the dismantling of the country. To work with the dems is to work toward destroying this country.


So yes, it is an insult?
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
322 posts
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

What is there to work together on?


So it is an insult?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram