- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: IRS gave thousands of tax payer documents to the White House
Posted on 11/28/14 at 8:28 am to Da Sheik
Posted on 11/28/14 at 8:28 am to Da Sheik
quote:
“[T]he Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) informed Cause of Action that there exist nearly 2,500 potentially responsive documents relating to investigations of improper disclosures of confidential taxpayer information by the IRS to the White House,” Cause of Action noted, according to the Daily Caller.
0
Posted on 11/28/14 at 9:00 am to 20MuleTeam
quote:
At first I was concerned, then I saw the link was to NewsMax and immediately knew he story was horsecrap, now I can rest easier
Taken from the Daily Caller, LINK. It is also in front of a court, so I think there may be something to it.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 9:05 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Taken from the Daily Caller, LINK. It is also in front of a court, so I think there may be something to it.
Let's see if it gets discussed on the nightly news...
Posted on 11/28/14 at 9:16 am to 20MuleTeam
quote:
Wow, typical commie ideologue, you're so poor at English you don't no the meanin of "no" in response to the very direct question. If you understood English, you would not have taken from my answer what you concluded; thus your response is gibberish
quote:
But you'd have no problem with stuff posted on huffington, mother jones, media matters, daily kos, etc?
quote:
No
First time being called a commie. I'm touched!
I REALLY like your use of grammar here:
quote:
Hahahaha all those years if high priced oil and you fools in Louisiana elect all these republican assclowns and now when oil goes down again you'll still have nothing to show for it and be even broker. So sad, glad I GTFO after graduation
So you used Texas to get ahead and now hate it?
Stay classy!
This post was edited on 11/28/14 at 9:17 am
Posted on 11/28/14 at 9:19 am to Da Sheik
Odds of 99.999999% of those tax payer documents being conservative groups?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:32 am to Da Sheik
"Vast right wing conspiracy"
"I just heard about this on the news"
" that was a long time ago"
" what difference does it make"
" I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewensky"
What talking point will they offer this time?
"I just heard about this on the news"
" that was a long time ago"
" what difference does it make"
" I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewensky"
What talking point will they offer this time?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:38 am to Revelator
quote:
What talking point will they offer this time?
"Congress did not act, so we must"
Posted on 11/28/14 at 10:57 am to wickowick
quote:
"Congress did not act, so we must"
But they did act. He just didn't like their actions.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:05 am to idlewatcher
But, if .0000001% are non-conservative, then it is non-partisan.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:56 pm to gatorrocks
Who said anything about Texas??????
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:21 pm to Da Sheik
People need to be prosecuted.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:23 pm to LSUwag
Obviously the words smidgen and corruption have different meanings to a constitutional scholar.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:43 pm to Holden Caulfield
It is time for a special prosecutor to be assigned to this...
Posted on 11/28/14 at 4:07 pm to wickowick
quote:
It is time for a special prosecutor to be assigned to this...
Holder will not do it. Only hope is if a federal judge appoints one.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 5:04 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:Well, unfortunately the title of the article by NewsMax, "IRS gave thousands of tax payer documents to the White House", is factually incorrect, so there's that.
Well, it's Newsmax citing The Daily Caller citing a lawsuit filed, but I guess you couldn't figure that out.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 5:50 pm to wickowick
Unreal
By far the worst scandal
By far the worst scandal
Posted on 11/28/14 at 5:52 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Well, unfortunately the title of the article by NewsMax, "IRS gave thousands of tax payer documents to the White House", is factually incorrect, so there's that.
2500 responsive documents. What's your opinion on this matter?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 6:02 pm to Paluka
quote:By "responsive" documents they mean documents and e-mails that were returned in a query. It doesn't mean that there were 2500 financial documents disclosed.
2500 responsive documents. What's your opinion on this matter?
They are still reading through the last 500 out of 2500 to see if they are "responsive", meaning do they actually correspond to the case in question.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 6:07 pm to mmcgrath
I know what "responsive" means in this context. I did not ask you to define the word. I asked for your opinion on this matter. Try again?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 7:39 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
By "responsive" documents they mean documents and e-mails that were returned in a query. It doesn't mean that there were 2500 financial documents disclosed. They are still reading through the last 500 out of 2500 to see if they are "responsive", meaning do they actually correspond to the case in question.
I hear they are coming out with a new shampoo called "Lefty Lotion". It is formulated to repair hair splitting. You might want to order a case perhaps?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News