- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE Safety vs 2nd Amendment Right to Bear Arms
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:33 pm to lake chuck fan
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:33 pm to lake chuck fan
Glad you were not around during our Revolutionary period... with your passive conformity to tyrannical authority, we would still be paying taxes to the Queen and quartering soldiers in our colonies. Here's a few words of "stupid" wisdom...You must address injustice and infringement on personal liberties by those in authority, especially when those institutions refuse to take measures or address systemic shortfalls. Policing in this country is an abortion and is need of serious reform.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:39 pm to Fanatics
I'm neither a cocksucker nor a leftist...I'm a constitutionalist and not afraid to demand accountability of those in positions of power and authority. Blind trust without accountability is what Germany had in the 1930s...see where that led them.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:53 pm to stout
Yes, ICE tried to disarm him because they thought he posed a threat, even though he showed no hostile action prior to engagement.
I guess a bigger question is: Can LEOs assume implied hostile intention based on visual observations even in the absence of all other indicators? Is suspicion enough?
Right now, LEOs in many states can confiscate and keep a citizen's personal property (cars, cash, property, etc), without formal charge, based solely on suspicion of illegal activity. Are we at that point when it comes to disarming legally armed citizens.
I guess a bigger question is: Can LEOs assume implied hostile intention based on visual observations even in the absence of all other indicators? Is suspicion enough?
Right now, LEOs in many states can confiscate and keep a citizen's personal property (cars, cash, property, etc), without formal charge, based solely on suspicion of illegal activity. Are we at that point when it comes to disarming legally armed citizens.
Popular
Back to top

1





