- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I know many of you hate Loomer but her latest scoop may have ended the NYC civil trial.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:18 am to Ribbed
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:18 am to Ribbed
quote:
think you're stretching unless you can prove that his wife is profiting directly
The goalpost do not need to be moved to "profiting" to prove bias but since you mentioned profiting and you want to move the goalposts, here you go:
What about the son?
quote:
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
WATCH: Here is the video evidence that Ian Engoron, the son of leftist NYC Judge Arthur Engoron, deleted his LinkedIn Page after I published my expose about him and his presence in the court room.
What is Ian hiding? How much money is the Leftist activist law-firm he works for in NYC making off of their relationship with Judge Engoron via his son?
There needs to be an investigation into the Engoron family.
LINK
quote:
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
EXCLUSIVE:
Judge Arthur Engoron has made the Trump trial a family affair and potentially has reserved seats for his son, Ian Engoron, who may be financially benefiting from the Trump Trial via his position at an Democrat activist law firm in New York City, and his father’s position as the judge overseeing Trump’s trial in NYC.
During my investigation into communist NYC judge Arthur Engoron, I discovered that he has 4 children.
His son’s name is Ian, and he often references his son in his writings on “The Wheatley Alumni Newsletter”, which is operated and controlled by Arthur Engoron.
I have every edition archived.
Ian Engoron is a radical leftist lawyer who works as an “Associate Shareholder” at the activist “Olsham Law Firm” in New York City.
“Shareholder activism” implies that Ian is working to secure financial deals for his law firm and their investors based off of political outcomes and political influence.
What type of shareholder position does Ian have in the Civil Fraud trial his father is overseeing against President Trump?
Is Arthur Engoron assisting his son during the trial so that his son and his law firm can gain more notoriety and financial status? As you can see from the pics below, Ian Engoron has been prominently seated during the Trump trial.
It sure looks like it!
Why is Judge Engoron giving his son, and possibly even his sons’ colleagues at the law firm, preferential access to the Trump trial that he is presiding over?
Seems highly unethical and illegal for Judge Engoron and his son Ian to be doing this…
Why has Ian Engoron, the son of communist Judge Arthur Engoron been given preferential access and reserved seats to the Trump civil fraud trial by his father?
There needs to be an immediate investigation into how Arthur Engoron is exploiting the Trump trial he’s overseeing to help financially bolster his son’s radical agenda and Leftist, Activist law firm.
LINK
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 10:20 am
1
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:20 am to Leto II
quote:
So that goes the same for Ginny Thomas, right?
Absolutely. Let us know when this happens with Ginny Thomas.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:20 am to Ribbed
Can we all pause for and toast our MAGA Congressman George Santos? Heckin love that rascal! 
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:21 am to Ribbed
quote:
Ribbed
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
1372 posts
Online
quote:
How does her bias implicate him?
These alters are out of control
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:23 am to SirWinston
quote:
MAGA Congressman George Santos
What's happening with this guy? I have not been following.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:27 am to GumboPot
quote:
The goalpost do not need to be moved to "profiting" to prove bia
You have to show his family benfits diectly from the outcome of the case.
quote:
How much money is the Leftist activist law-firm he works for in NYC making off of their relationship with Judge Engoron via his son?
Which brings me back to my question: Can you prove it? How do you think the courts will respond to added scrutiny on their families?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:27 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
It doesn't. His own bias implicates him but his wife posting anti-Trump memes and messages is meaningless.
An unpopular but correct take.
If we’re going to start assigning guilt based on personal connections…. I don’t think anyone wants that.
The judge himself has done enough damning crap that we don’t need to say “see what his crazy wife said!”
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:28 am to GumboPot
quote:
Laura doxed Judge Engoron's wife and exposed her TDS via twitter posting frick Trump memes. This is a clear case if bias and legal heavyweights like Johnathan Turley agree.
Laura Loomer is insane, so I wish she would recognize that about herself and would have let someone else break this.
That said, credit where it is due. Looks like she actually did something worth doing this time. Would be great if shed focus her crazy on Democrats more often instead of blowing minor nonsense on the GOP side completely out of proportion.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:28 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
These alters are out of control
If you can't answer the question just say so. It's the only question that matters. Tantrums won't change that.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:28 am to Ribbed
quote:
You have to show his family benfits diectly from the outcome of the case.
So bias is only proven by profit?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:30 am to GumboPot
quote:
So bias is only proven by profit?
Can you read? Go find the statute that says his family's public political activities impugn him.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:31 am to Ribbed
quote:
I think you're stretching unless you can prove that his wife is profiting directly from this case, which I don't think you'll do. Judges aren't going to open themselves up to constant scrutiny and the law wouldn't stand such an attack. In short, his wife is allowed to have an opinion.
It’s no stretch. The code discusses even the appearance of impropriety. You’re stating an opinion. I posted a section of the judicial code.
You are aware that attorneys have a higher standard of ethical expectations than other professions. Judges ethics standards are even higher than that. And they are codified. I cited the code. Your opinion on how it should be is what doesn’t matter.
I know you want trump to succumb to this lawfare, but this case isn’t the one that will do it.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:32 am to Ribbed
Oh look. AggieHank has an alter.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:32 am to BBONDS25
quote:
The code discusses even the appearance of impropriety. You’re stating an opinion.
From the judge. The family is addressed separately.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:32 am to RedStickFox
quote:
Well if bat shite crazy laura loomer said it happened and a cartoonist that thinks he can hypnotize people believes it it's gotta be true.
You are denying the judge’s wife posted what she posted?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:34 am to BBONDS25
quote:
I know you want trump to succumb to this lawfare, but this case isn’t the one that will do it.
You don't know what my opinion is because I haven't stated it. Deep breath, little budy.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:35 am to Ribbed
quote:
You have to show his family benfits diectly from the outcome of the case.
Where did you get this idea? It isn’t remotely accurate.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:35 am to GumboPot
The judge and the state DA both ran for election on a "get Trump" platform. That alone should get them removed, disbarred and jailed.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:37 am to Ribbed
quote:
From the judge. The family is addressed separately.
It’s all in section 100.3. The judge and the judges family actions are all described in the same section. You’re just wrong on this one. An unbiased look at this would certainly at least rise to the level of an appearance of impropriety which would violate subsection A.
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 10:38 am
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:38 am to BBONDS25
quote:
which would violate subsection A.
Agan, no one thought so with Judge Thomas' wife.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News