re: I Have Compiled A Deep Spectral Analysis Of Micheal Flynn’s Posting History…

quote:

---

Absolutely agree. I think the midterms for Republicans are probably toast if the US is still trying to subdue the Islamic regime after July, the Democratic Socialists will likely take the House and maybe the Senate.

The action Trump 2.0 is taking against the Islamic Regime may end up a protracted shite show or a glorious victory, too earlier to tell. If this military operation is considered by the majority of Americans a success when all is said and done it still doesn't mean the Republicans don't lose the House and Senate in 2026 and that's unfortunate.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

By the time the fallout to this latest American-led regime change effort settles, you and I — along with most people over 50 — will either be dead or watching events unfold in a nursing home. While Presidents come and go, the Deep State rules in perpetuity.

In this wholly corrupted political environment, the campaign promises expire every election cycle. The Middle East will be a protracted mess long after Trump has been reduced to cable news retrospectives or Netflix documentaries.

If History teaches nothing else, it teaches us the consequences of U.S. intervention in the Middle East will ripple across the region for decades to come. The 1953 CIA-led coup in Iran — which replaced the nationalist Prime Minister Mossadegh with the Shah — indeed set off decades of festering antagonism by radical Islamic elements in Iran.

The Shah himself was undermined by agents of chaos in our nation’s own wholly corrupted national security apparatus. Declassified documents revealed that the Carter Administration was indirectly communicating with Khomeini and other opposition leaders, contradicting the widely disseminated narrative that the Carter Administration was wholly surprised by the Iranian Revolution.

If the Republican Guard is toppled and Iran descends into a failed state, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf Kingdoms will turn on each other, competing to fill that power vacuum. The sectarian rivalries in the Middle East indeed are not just between Sunni and Shia Muslims; it also exists between Sunni nations.

Saudi Arabia is at odd with Turkey over Ankara’s engagement with the Muslim Brotherhood. Riyadh views the Muslim Brotherhood as an existential threat to Saudi Arabia’s monarchical rule.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar have likewise been at odd over Doha’s engagement with the Muslim Brotherhood. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have strained diplomatic relationships over their competing strategic agenda in Yemen.

Similarly, the U.A.E. and Qatar have a strained relationship because of their differing visions for regional stability. Against this convoluted backdrop of shifting alliances and competing interests, it is misguided for the United States to keep inserting itself as an arbiter capable of picking winners and losers in these ancient sectarian and ideological struggles between medieval theocracies and authoritarian regimes.

All the more reason to extract ourselves militarily from the Middle East. Let’s leave the sandpit of vipers once and for all.

Iran And The Shah. What Really Happened?

…Long regarded as a U.S. ally, the Shah was pro-Western and anti-communist, and he was aware that he posed the main barrier to Soviet ambitions in the Middle East. As distinguished foreign-affairs analyst Hilaire du Berrier noted: “He determined to make Iran capable of blocking a Russian advance until the West should realize to what extent her own interests were threatened and come to his aid…. It necessitated an army of 250,000 men.” The Shah’s air force ranked among the world’s five best. A voice for stability within the Middle East itself, he favored peace with Israel and supplied the beleaguered state with oil.

On the home front, the Shah protected minorities and permitted non-Muslims to practice their faiths. “All faith,” he wrote, “imposes respect upon the beholder.” The Shah also brought Iran into the 20th century by granting women equal rights. This was not to accommodate feminism, but to end archaic brutalization.

Yet, at the height of Iran’s prosperity, the Shah suddenly became the target of an ignoble campaign led by U.S. and British foreign policy makers. Bolstered by slander in the Western press, these forces, along with Soviet-inspired communist insurgents, and mullahs opposing the Shah’s progressiveness, combined to face him with overwhelming opposition. In three years he went from vibrant monarch to exile (on January 16, 1979), and ultimately death, while Iran fell to Ayatollah Khomeini’s terror.

quote:

---

The Q jig is up and boarEd and Vox are feds.

---

quote:

---

if that's not cut and paste which i assume it is, how much time did you waste on that, and then please tell me what i'm supposed to pretend you do for a living son?

---

Did you ask the same of Kash Patel’s squeeze?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.