- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Horowitz has 104 criminal or administrative investigations of alleged misconduct
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:30 am
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:30 am
quote:Why this kind of guessing info. 4 days away? His source could say how many criminal how many administrative.
LINK
Re: The Paul Begala saying impeach Trump until he is gone tweet. IIRC: I remember this report from early Nov.
UPDATE ETA:
https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1911.pdf
This post was edited on 12/5/19 at 11:28 am
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:31 am to cajunangelle
2 years of Dead Silence from horowitz's office, and now two days before the reports released, and everybody has leaks Galore? Not buying it, but 104 criminal referrals is a lot more likely than the zero that some of the boo birds have been predicting.
This post was edited on 12/5/19 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:37 am to VoxDawg
"But when will something actually happen?" - concern trolls on Political Talk
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:38 am to VoxDawg
Sperry is usually 2-3 days ahead of the news. No one knows how many criminal or how many administrative but the ones that read the entire report which are probably Ratcliffe, Barr's team and others. (Remember the accused can only read the section about themselves.)
I think leaking this info with the tease of criminal or admin is weird.
I am wondering which gangof8 type members have gotten briefed? Was Pelosi briefed?
I think leaking this info with the tease of criminal or admin is weird.
I am wondering which gangof8 type members have gotten briefed? Was Pelosi briefed?
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:41 am to cajunangelle
Priebus was by far Trump’s worst/most naive hire. I think he was #resist from day 1.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:41 am to saints5021
At this point no one is a concern troll. This crap has gone on so long that Bunyan has had blue balls and left for Tahiti, then went to Bora Bora and came back with blue balls. It is all real old, you have to admit.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:44 am to cajunangelle
That Pelosi pulls the trigger on this today is totally predictable.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:44 am to Flats
I know that in DC they are all friends in crime and money but Paul Begala? Were they hatching a plan to get R's on board for impeachment? Or even a deal for Turtle and Burr to assist? Reince was on Hannity when last week? Acting like Graham, like he cares about the entrapment Obama admin coup...
Posted on 12/5/19 at 10:51 am to Flats
Any lawyers want to clarify exactly what this means?
quote:
"The criminal investigations involve "serious allegations of official misconduct."
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:04 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:06 am to YankeeBama
Might want to add that link to OP. Sperry is 100% correct.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:07 am to VoxDawg
quote:According to who? No one knew how she was going to react. There were thoughts, rumors and leaks she was pissed seeing the polls; and leaning towards an out with maybe censure. No one knew or predicted. I am presuming (a huge presumption) that she has seen a briefing of the IG report so she is going for broke?
That Pelosi pulls the trigger on this today is totally predictable.
Sperry reporting Pelosi called James Rosen Mr Republican talking points and she is basically wigging-out.
LINK
If anybody thinks that she wants to move on and legislate and poor Nancy is being controlled by her left wing, think again...
I didn't know she took questions, anybody have the link?
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:12 am to cajunangelle
This thread should be getting way more attention. These are extremely good signs for Monday.
This post was edited on 12/5/19 at 11:13 am
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:13 am to YankeeBama
Maybe I am reading it wrong? Page 16 says they closed unsubstantiated claims? Is there more info of a link within that?
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:15 am to YankeeBama
How was that PDF dropped in major MSM news? On the OIG twitter page?
Go on of how this is good news, please and hurry.
Go on of how this is good news, please and hurry.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:18 am to YankeeBama
quote:
YankeeBama
Nice find thanks for sharing
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:19 am to cajunangelle
Page 19 has the 104 number Sperry is referring to. Of those 104 we can assume at least 8 are from fisa investigation based off of the timing.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:21 am to YankeeBama
I am on a FF browser and apologize your graph pic was not showing red exed for me. I viewed image now. Thanks.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 11:23 am to cajunangelle
quote:
in the 6 month period from April 1 to Sept. 30, 2019, the OIG opened up 8 cases of official misconduct.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News