- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homosexuality not caused by genetics. They ar not "born that way ETA Addit link added
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:05 pm to Pocket Kingz
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:05 pm to Pocket Kingz
quote:
For the people ITT that feel they must reconcile their beliefs on homosexuality with their religious beliefs,
Who are you referring to?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:07 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Exactly here is a list of all genetic problems known at birth:
Why are you asking me to review those conditions?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:08 pm to Dale51
Because I'm lazy and responded to the last post that was in the thread?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:08 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'll bet he agrees with the fact there are not glaciers covering Manhattan Island.
I'll bet he agrees with the fact our climate has warmed since there were glaciers covering Manhattan Island.
of course!
I posted the Jesse meme with a little 'tongue in cheek' in mind.
I been around the block more than once in 'nature/nurture' threads citing twin studies.
So, I know that there are some rebuttals to those twin studies, as you quickly pointed out.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Nice straw man.
How so? You can't tell someone's gay just by looking at them especially not when they are babies
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:10 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Because I'm lazy and responded to the last post that was in the thread?
'K.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:10 pm to Dale51
But homosexuality is not on that list of "genetic" defects.
Certainly, if they had absolute proof it was and could cite they underlying problems they would put it on that list as being a "genetic" problem, right?
Certainly, if they had absolute proof it was and could cite they underlying problems they would put it on that list as being a "genetic" problem, right?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:11 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
But homosexuality is not on that list of "genetic" defects. Certainly, if they had absolute proof it was and could cite they underlying problems they would put it on that list as being a "genetic" problem, right?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:12 pm to Errerrerrwere
We've all seen the feminine guys, etc. so there's no doubt in my mind that genetics can play a role in determining sexual preference. I don't doubt his data relative to the twin studies but objectively twin studies by their very nature are a limited sample size. I also believe that environment might be much more of a factor than homosexuals and their liberal progressive proponents are willing to admit.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:13 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
How so? You can't tell someone's gay just by looking at them especially not when they are babies
Is there any way to test for conditions like dyslexia or having the gey? Would it show in genetic testing?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:13 pm to GurleyGirl
I don't think that genetics plays a role in the feminine guys. I think their bodies just produce more estrogen tbh. 
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:14 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Certainly, if they had absolute proof it was and could cite they underlying problems they would put it on that list as being a "genetic" problem, right?
I agree. I'm not in the "its genetic" camp.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:14 pm to Dale51
Then why say it's genetic if there's no way to test it?
That's my main question. And I've been asking it for 2 pages.
That's my main question. And I've been asking it for 2 pages.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:15 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:if you need a link for basic logic there's no hope for you
quote:
Like most things, it's a choice.
Link?
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:15 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:In those 2 pages, I've never implied it was.
Then why say it's genetic if there's no way to test it? That's my main question. And I've been asking it for 2 pages.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:17 pm to Dale51
Sorry Dale. I was trying to reply to Dire Wolf. One Margarita into this day and I'm acting like this?
I may need to slow down.
I may need to slow down.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:20 pm to Errerrerrwere
All I know is that pretty much every gay person I've known, it was obvious pretty early in their life... at least in hindsight. Whether it's genetic or not I am in favor of treating it as though it is outside of their control.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:21 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Sorry Dale. I was trying to reply to Dire Wolf. One Margarita into this day and I'm acting like this? I may need to slow down.
No problem! Margarita...mmMMmmmmm....
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:36 pm to Toddy
quote:
Real unbiased website you have here.
People keep bringing up the website or the guy who published it, but that is pretty immaterial. It is the study that matters more than the web site it was posted on.
We can't actually find the study, so that might shed some doubt...but the publisher does not shed the doubt.
If you want to doubt because the publisher is doubtful, ok....but that proves nothing in and of itself. The proof of it being valid or invalid is in the study itself.
The National Enquirer has published some scandals that have turned out to be true. Not a good source, but the scandals were true nonetheless.
I believe it was the National Enquirer that broke the John Edwards love child story. None of the MSM would accept it or report it, but it turned out to be true.
(This in no way insinuates I get my news from the National Enquirer, though)
Posted on 7/4/17 at 12:36 pm to Swoopin
quote:
All I know is that pretty much every gay person I've known, it was obvious pretty early in their life... at least in hindsight. Whether it's genetic or not I am in favor of treating it as though it is outside of their control.
This is where I am at. It was pretty obvious from a very young age where my cousin was going with his life.
I am not scientist but of the handful of gay people I know, I have never met one that felt they had a "choice".
Popular
Back to top


0






