Started By
Message

re: Homosexuality not caused by genetics. They ar not "born that way ETA Addit link added

Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:46 pm to
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
16891 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

To further an agenda of course


Fine. Whatever. Irrelevant to the point.

You said it yourself. There is an agenda. The "why" of same sex attraction matters which is why anybody would bother to have an agenda in the first place.
This post was edited on 7/4/17 at 11:48 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:47 pm to
The OP specifically says that homosexuality is not genetic.
Posted by PepeSilvia
Member since Apr 2017
360 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

But apparently you do.


You're right. I do.



Appropriate clerks link
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:50 pm to
You stalking me bro?

I kind of have a fat arse. I don't miss leg day.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
16891 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

The OP specifically says that homosexuality is not genetic


Maybe it is. Maybe it isn't. Studies are hardly conclusive.

This guy told me simple logic proves homosexuality is a choice. I'm still waiting on his simple logic.
This post was edited on 7/4/17 at 11:54 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:53 pm to
Well, there has been three studies mentioned in this thread. One debunked.

The only one saying they found the gay gene.
Posted by PepeSilvia
Member since Apr 2017
360 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:54 pm to
Nah. Just having some fun.

Take it easy on the gay folks. Nature v. Nurture, does it really matter? People are people, and if it doesn't affect you what's the big deal?
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:56 pm to
Dude, look at your post history.

Everything you talk about is about cocks, micro-penises, and being gay.

Maybe you are projecting.

Hmmmmm...
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:57 pm to
I've only said I disagree with the science of them saying it's genetic.

How ib the frick do you get that that's not taking it easy on the gay folks.

Quit being so sensitive to everything you read on a message board, phaggitt
This post was edited on 7/4/17 at 11:58 pm
Posted by PepeSilvia
Member since Apr 2017
360 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 12:03 am to
Ok, ok.

You don't have an agenda against homosexuals, and you were only posting the article to provide scientific edification for the poliboard. You're also not latently homosexual yourself. I made that up, because I thought it was funny and felt like fricking with you after the comments you made to Toddy.

You probably have a lovely wife and two wonderful children, and if we lived near each other we might even have a beer together. You're just another guy in this big country made up of all kinds of people just trying to make a life for themselves without some twat trolling them.

Happy Fourth...oh shite... Fifth. I got a long drive in the morning. Good night for real.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 12:04 am
Posted by RDOtiger
Zachary
Member since Oct 2013
1173 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 12:05 am to
quote:

Think about this though... What the frick could ever happen,that could turn a straight guy queer? I can't think of one thing that makes sense. It seems to me that that they must be born gay.


Well, people with clinical depression or bipolar disorder aren't usually born with those abnormalities either - they don't choose to have a mental disorder - it's usually a chemical imbalance that occurs in the teenage hormonal stage. Maybe homosexuality follows a similar pattern?

I wonder if test have been conducted on twins to see if they share mental disorders, as well...
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 12:18 am to
The only thing I've ever claimed in this thread was the science wasn't there to justify the "genetic" reasoning.

Again, the only problem I have is the left politicking through science that hasn't been proven.

Not everyone who doesn't blindly follows is a denier.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 12:32 am
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11516 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:27 am to
Wow. I gotta say congrats on getting a 430+ post thread on behavioral genetics.

Sounds like a good test case to try to disprove Godwin's law. This has to have devolved a discussion of Nazi eugenics at some point, right?
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:47 am to
It did briefly in one of the studies I linked about the famed "gay gene" they were sure of thirty years ago.

Had a good fourth, doc?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11516 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:05 am to
For sure.

Hope you did the same.

Now taking advantage of a quiet house to get a little work done, and procrastinate on the poli-board of course. Have we found the cause for homosexuality yet?

Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:10 am to
Of course not.

The only thing we know at this point is that we cannot identify the gene.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11516 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:51 am to
Yeah, I'll start off by saying I don't know the literature on homosexuality, but I'm not aware of any behavioral traits that have been associated with single genes. Virtually any behavioral trait studied is at least partially accounted for by heritability, though, presumably through many genes. In fact, heritability of behavioral traits is so easily replicable that it's been stated (with only a little exaggeration, I think) as to a so-called "first law of behavioral genetics" that "all behavioral traits are heritable". That's not to say that all traits entirely or even primarily heritable, only that they're partially so since like in your OP, lots of the literature only find part of the variance in traits explainable by heritability.

What's interesting and non-intuitive comes in second and third laws, which state that the effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of the genes (2nd law) and that "a substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families" (3rd law), with that other portion often attributed to peer-group effects and other non-shared environments.

In summary, for most traits tested (IQ, personality, etc., genes contribute ~40-50%, shared environment (family rearing) 0-10%, unique environment 50% (peer groups, outside environment like school, culture, and ???).
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
42876 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:04 am to
And I tend to agree with your second paragraph. I think a very small portion of it is genetic.

I believe the larger portion is environment.

But no one really knows. What we do know right now; is that it strictly being genetic has not been proven. Hence, they aren't just born with it.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33051 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 6:40 am to
quote:

Homosexuality not caused by genetics. They are not "born that way


This is a shocking development.

Not really.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/5/17 at 6:57 am to
quote:


This is a shocking development.


It might be if it was really a development.
Jump to page
Page First 20 21 22 23 24 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 22 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram