- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Homosexuality not caused by genetics. They ar not "born that way ETA Addit link added
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:27 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:27 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Then wtf are you doing in the tread, troll?
I'm done with you. I knew when I responded it would turn into a circle jerk of logic and fiction.
Have a good evening.
I'm done with you. I knew when I responded it would turn into a circle jerk of logic and fiction.
Have a good evening.
1
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:27 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Homosexuality not caused by genetics. They are not "born that way."
Fact.
Some gays even sleep with girls. You won't find any straight guys sleeping with dudes occasionally. It's all 100% a choice
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:28 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
No one is getting hot and bothered. We are having a grown up discussion.
Didn't you say you were going to bed? The grown ups are talking here.
Don't forget to pack your ear drops. You have swimming tomorrow.
I'm just now ready for bed, and yes after my workday I may go for a swim. Eardrops could come in handy, thanks.
Let me just say before I hit the hay, you'd be happier if you'd stop thinking about other people's dicks all the time.
Just leave other people's dicks alone.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:29 pm to PepeSilvia
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:29 pm to Jorts R Us
1 - Attraction doesn't matter. I had a next door neighbor who could have doubled for Tahnee Welch. I didn't hit on her because I had a choice. I didn't go over to their pool when she was laying out (which she did a lot) or find things to do by the fence. Which btw took a LOT of restraint.
Everyone has a choice to act, or not on their impulses.
2 - I do. Because as I said you can't force someone to believe an act is moral. You can legislate the penalties for it, but you can't force them to believe it. Morality from my experience is more about some wanting to believe they are superior to someone else for whatever reason.
3 - Yep. Now the question really should instead be should those rights in fact be equal.
Nice job of not trying to play whack a link btw.
Everyone has a choice to act, or not on their impulses.
2 - I do. Because as I said you can't force someone to believe an act is moral. You can legislate the penalties for it, but you can't force them to believe it. Morality from my experience is more about some wanting to believe they are superior to someone else for whatever reason.
3 - Yep. Now the question really should instead be should those rights in fact be equal.
Nice job of not trying to play whack a link btw.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:29 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Then wtf are you doing in the tread, troll?
Setting a few people straight on their bullshite. I didn't ask you to respond in the first place. You're always welcome to frick off.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:30 pm to Errerrerrwere
Is that a Freudian slip meme, bro?
Either way, I'm going to upvote. It looks like you're coming around to the perspective that you might want to suck a D, and if that's your thing it's ok.
Either way, I'm going to upvote. It looks like you're coming around to the perspective that you might want to suck a D, and if that's your thing it's ok.
This post was edited on 7/4/17 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:31 pm to PepeSilvia
No man. It's a dude yawning.
What do you see?
Why have you been talking about other guys wanting to suck dicks all throughout this thread?
It's okay buddy. You can stare at his arse. Like I said; I don't care.
What do you see?
Why have you been talking about other guys wanting to suck dicks all throughout this thread?
It's okay buddy. You can stare at his arse. Like I said; I don't care.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:31 pm to Errerrerrwere
Best if you ignore DisplacedCuckeye. He's some angry old frick who lives alone
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:32 pm to texag7
I know. I made the point I made to just show him how stupid he was sounding.
Like always, he asked for a link!
Like always, he asked for a link!
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This is the result of filtering all information through their worldviews before trying to understand it.
If there was a ever a more succinct description of this place, I've never heard one.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:33 pm to texag7
quote:
He's some angry old frick who lives alone
0-2.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:33 pm to texag7
quote:
Fact.
Some gays even sleep with girls. You won't find any straight guys sleeping with dudes occasionally. It's all 100% a choice
Well, I'm convinced. This scientific analysis must surely be published and peer reviewed.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:33 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Like always, he asked for a link!
Which, as usual, you could not provide.
Stop making shite up.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:34 pm to Errerrerrwere
Maybe I watched too much GOT today, but it looks like a dude either yawning or sucking a phantom cock. It's all good. I don't judge.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:35 pm to PepeSilvia
But apparently you do.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:37 pm to llfshoals
I love how understanding the "why" of same sex attraction is now irrelevant when it's the whole premise of this thread. Why do you think they did this study to begin with?
This post was edited on 7/4/17 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:40 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:I didn't ignore it, I said it didn't matter because there are simply too many variables. You could drop 2 human beings with similar genetic markers in the same environment and get completely different results. Hell you could to it with 20 and get 20 different ones.
The guys claims simple logic proves homosexuality is a choice. Then he states the obvious by saying choosing to act on sexual impulse is a choice but ignores the real question of whether the attraction that drives that impulse is a matter of choice. Then he says, the "why" behind the impulse is irrelevant when it's the very reason why anybody bothered publishing a fricking study in the first place.
The so-called study should have been called Swiss Cheese from all the holes in its methodology. The reason it was funded was to get the result the funding called for.
Look for the puppetteer.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:44 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:To further an agenda of course.
Why do you think they did this study to begin with?
What, you didn't think research projects as aren't given a result to produce these days did you?
If you did you're incredibly naive.
Posted on 7/4/17 at 11:44 pm to llfshoals
quote:
The so-called study should have been called Swiss Cheese from all the holes in its methodology. The reason it was funded was to get the result the funding called for. Look for the puppetteer.
That's no the point, dude. The point is not to opine on the validity of this study. The point is there was a study looking to answer...
The why of same sex attraction.
You contradict yourself. If the why is so irrelevant, why is there a puppeteer?
Page 21 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News