- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Headline from The Hill: Trump's L.L. Bean tweet would break WH policy
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:23 pm to L.A.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:23 pm to L.A.
And you presume way too much. Even if all of what you said is true, which it very well could be, the endorsement was skillfully done as to not appear as an endorsement. So am I to understand that you think what Mrs Obama did was unethical, yet what Trump tweeted was okay?
ETA: and Obama wasn't president when the Michelle/J Crew thing happened.
ETA: and Obama wasn't president when the Michelle/J Crew thing happened.
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:28 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:I think whatever they were/are, they are the same.
So am I to understand that you think what Mrs Obama did was unethical, yet what Trump tweeted was okay?
quote:And Trump wasn't president when the LL Bean thing happened. Obama was the president elect when Michelle went on TV and touted J Crew. President Elect. Just like Trump.
and Obama wasn't president when the Michelle/J Crew thing happened.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:31 pm to L.A.
quote:
And Trump wasn't president when the LL Bean thing happened. Obama was the president elect when Michelle went on TV and touted J Crew. President Elect. Just like Trump.
Yeah, did you misread my original post?
quote:
It would be unethical if he tweeted that as president.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:31 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
We're in charge now. We'll decide what is appropriate and what isn't.
Wait till we fire up the IRS.
Wait till we fire up the IRS.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:35 pm to MrLarson
The only reason he did this was because liberals called for a boycott because one of their executive supported him. If liberals can try to hurt companies for supporting Trump, then it's fair game to try to help them. Escoecially companies that manufacture products in the USA.
So stop being whiny bitches and trying to hurt American workers, and maybe he won't tweet support for companies.
So stop being whiny bitches and trying to hurt American workers, and maybe he won't tweet support for companies.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:36 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:I did miss that. My apologies.
Yeah, did you misread my original post?
My original point still holds. The MSM used a misleading headline for this article to make it appear that Trump is violating some kind of law, when in fact the rule in question is nothing more than an Obama WH policy that Trump is perfectly free to ignore now, and will be perfectly free to change once he gets into office.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:01 am to Quidam65
quote:Drinking a Yeungling while sporting your New Balance shoes.
Did I forget anything?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 9:04 am to L.A.
quote:
1. Trump isn't even in the White House yet.
Exactly!
Back to top

2





