Started By
Message

re: Grassley tweet may have underlying meaning Trump NOT being investigated

Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14429 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
The same press that ties every fricking thing in the world with even a remote "Russian" connection back to Trump are only doing so because Trump somehow injected himself into their stories? That press? The same press that claims Trump was paid back in 05, through a home sale mind you, by the Russians(because it was obvious he would be president even then) that they only do that because he jumped into the fray to defend himself? Really?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

The fact you take any of them at their word is more telling than any of the bull shite you vomited in your preceding posts.
So I see a story that provides no evidence Trump is under investigation, and explicitly says as much. So because I assume that Trump isn't under investigation, which would be the most likely scenario anyway, is telling of something?

But then a vague tweet from a politician, the most crooked profession (even moreso than the media), which doesn't state anything really, is now interpetable? HMMMM
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38272 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Grassley can tell Trump and then Trump can use his declassification privilege


Sure. I think this is what we all would like him to do; but then the libs would melt over him intervening in an ongoing investigation.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

The same press that claims Trump was paid back in 05, through a home sale mind you, by the Russians(because it was obvious he would be president even then) that they only do that because he jumped into the fray to defend himself? Really?
I don't know. Maybe you should read more credible sources. I haven't read those stories.

Just like a right leaning site like The National Review will have more credible journalism than Breitbart. I don't lump a fake Breitbart article with every other source on the same side of the spectrum.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38272 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:18 pm to
Forgive me. I really have no idea what you are even arguing anymore.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14429 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I don't know. Maybe you should read more credible sources.


Rachel Maddow has been on this shite since the election and you've never heard about it? That bitch has been on the "Russian" shite since the "russian" thing came out after wikileaks but you try to spin out of it by blaming right wing sites? You are a clown and a poor one at that.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Forgive me. I really have no idea what you are even arguing anymore.
I'm arguing that Trump himself was probably never part of the investigation. And the more legitimate sources have never said he was. So then today didn't really change that logical conclusion.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Rachel Maddow has been on this shite since the election and you've never heard about it?
So when I say "follow more credible sources," you cite a source which isn't credible, the left's Hannity?
quote:

You are a clown and a poor one at that.
I'm a clown for not getting information for a known hack, who isn't even really a journalist in her current capacity?
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 3:28 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38272 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:28 pm to
Well, then I retract my veracity, sir. Kindly, Have a safe trip down the intraweb pathways. Good day.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14429 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

So when I say "follow more credible sources," you cite a source which isn't credible, the left's Hannity?


Yeah cuz no one else on MSNBC or CNN have done it too.

Like I said, you are a clown
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Yeah cuz no one else on MSNBC or CNN have done it too.
Maybe you should stop watching the terrible commentators on network TV, who give OPINIONS. In fact, I'm surprised that you think that they are journalistic sources.
quote:

Like I said, you are a clown
Well if knowing that those aren't journalists, makes me a clown, then Bozo is my idol.
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 3:33 pm
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14429 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:34 pm to
Yeah cuz they don't have a national TV audience and online presence. Oh my bad. You never heard of those stories before. Clown
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Yeah cuz they don't have a national TV audience and online presence. Oh my bad. You never heard of those stories before. Clown
You're calling me a clown for not listening to terrible sources? So if read a medical journal instead of "naturalnews.com" to form my opinion about some medical treatment, does that make me a clown?

This is asinine.
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 3:41 pm
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14429 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:43 pm to
No, I'm calling you a clown for trying to blame right wing sources for left wing news reports that are broadcast by major networks both on cable and the internet. Also for saying you haven't read these stories yet felt strongly enough about them to blame it on right wing sources.
Posted by Rakim
Member since Nov 2015
9954 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Grassley can tell Trump and then Trump can use his declassification privilege


When is Trump going to strike back
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

No, I'm calling you a clown for trying to blame right wing sources
Where did I blame a right wing source? I only brought those up to highlight two right wing sources, and one is more credible than the other. I was actually thinking about the fake news article about Starbucks CEO from Breitbart when I wrote that.
quote:

Also for saying you haven't read these stories yet felt strongly enough about them to blame it on right wing sources.
What? I never blamed them on any news source. What are you talking about?
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 4:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram