- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Grassley tweet may have underlying meaning Trump NOT being investigated
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:36 pm
quote:
FBI Dir Comey needs to be transparent + tell the public what he told me about whether he is or is not investigating @POTUS
Seems like Comey told Grassley he isn't investigating Trump.
4
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:38 pm to Errerrerrwere
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:38 pm to Errerrerrwere
Here we go
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:41 pm to CoachChappy
What would Senator Grassley want Comey to tell the public so bad that he tweeted it DURING the hearing?
Sounds like he was growing tired of the bullshite.
Sounds like he was growing tired of the bullshite.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
Democrats will promptly be calling for an investigation into Chuck Grassley's ties to Russia
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
What would Senator Grassley want Comey to tell the public so bad that he tweeted it DURING the hearing?
I just saw the time stamp and realized it was during the hearing.
1) Grassley needs to go ahead and say it if it isn't confidential.
2) Grassely is 83?
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:43 pm to DyeHardDylan
BREAKING: Chuck Grassley's twitter account hack by Russian KGB.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:44 pm to CoachChappy
I can't copy/paste twitter right now; so if someone else can; that'd be great.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:46 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Based on all of the information over the past few months, it would seem that whoever and whatever they are investigating, Trump's connection is that he is associated with those individuals, and they used to be on his team. But Trump himself hasn't been a focus.
What would Senator Grassley want Comey to tell the public so bad that he tweeted it DURING the hearing?
Even if Manafort did something illegal, they probably wanted to make sure it wasn't related to his previous position. Apparently it's not, but they probably wanted to make sure. Maybe "cover their bases" got overrated in terms of its likelihood.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:49 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
ased on all of the information over the past few months, it would seem that whoever and whatever they are investigating, Trump's connection is that he is associated with those individuals
bullshite. You don't have ONE piece of evidence to share with us regarding this.
quote:
But Trump himself hasn't been a focus
Yet, the media still lumps him in.
quote:
Even if Manafort did something illegal, they probably wanted to make sure it wasn't related to his previous position.
You have no idea Manafort did anything wrong. Again, see first response. Name one thing. ANYTHING.
quote:
Maybe "cover their bases" got overrated in terms of its likelihood.
Whatever that means...
Posted on 3/20/17 at 2:57 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Well the stories have focused on his associates, not him. Obviously I can't prove that they weren't investigating him, but the stories have been saying otherwise.
Bull shite. You don't have ONE piece of evidence to share with us regarding this.
quote:Trump lumped himself in. The media has tried to say otherwise, but go ahead and blame the media for instead.
Yet, the media still lumps him in.
quote:"Even if" was included for a reason; I was clearly using it as a hypothetical to show how the story could get twisted.
You have no idea Manafort did anything wrong. Again, see first response. Name one thing. ANYTHING.
quote:It means if they were investigating ex-advisors, then the probably wanted to make sure that they were investigating wasn't related to their positions in the campaign. Hence, my "even if" scenario where one of them did something illegal, but it had nothing to do with the campaign itself, but it would be doing due diligence to make sure. Therefore, that part, as a matter of diligence, could have gotten overrated.
Whatever that means...
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:00 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
stories
quote:
can't prove
quote:
media has tried to say
quote:
"Even if"
You sure sound like you know what you're talking about.
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:04 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
The media has tried to say otherwise
Are you saying that the media tried to say Trump WASN'T involved?
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:05 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:Well yeah, none of us do. Just look at your OP.
You sure sound like you know what you're talking about.
quote:We are all speculating, including yourself. So sorry for speculating in your thread speculative thread.
Seems like Comey told Grassley he isn't investigating Trump.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:05 pm to TidenUP
quote:
Are you saying that the media tried to say Trump WASN'T involved?
That's what I got out of it.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:06 pm to buckeye_vol
I think it's obvious it's what his tweet meant. You want me to change the OP?
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:07 pm to TidenUP
quote:Maybe guilt by association, but the journalist actually covering it have been specifically stating that these war associates. Even the infamous NYT article says that they don't know whether anybody else is being investigating, including Trump himself.
Are you saying that the media tried to say Trump WASN'T involved?
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:08 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I think it's obvious it's what his tweet meant.
quote:No. I'm just saying that it's been fairly obvious for a few weeks now. This is just support of that. But none of us know what is actually happening for sure.
You want me to change the OP?
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:09 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Maybe guilt by association, but the journalist actually covering it have been specifically stating that these war associates. Even the infamous NYT article says that they don't know whether anybody else is being investigating, including Trump himself.
The fact you take any of them at their word is more telling than any of the bullshite you vomited in your preceding posts.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 3:11 pm to Errerrerrwere
Grassley can tell Trump and then Trump can use his declassification privilege
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News