Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Forbes: "Obama's Unemployment 'New Normal' Foretells A 'Lost Decade'"

Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:55 pm
Posted by Volkosoby
Member since May 2017
2699 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:55 pm
Obama thinks he had something to do with President Trump's record setting economy!






Obama's Unemployment 'New Normal' Foretells A 'Lost Decade'

A quick look at the BLS Household Survey showed that, rather than being bad, December was actually a better-than-average month in President Obama’s “new normal” economy. This is not a huge accomplishment, given that “Obama’s new normal” comprises slow GDP growth, a stagnant jobs market, and falling real household incomes.


However, the nation moved 133,000 jobs closer to full-time-equivalent* (FTE) full employment during December, while during the average month during Obama’s so-called “economic recovery,” we moved 25,000 jobs farther away. So, December, as bad as it was in many respects, was better than average for Obama.


Since the economic recovery began 52 months ago, the “headline” U-3 unemployment rate has fallen from 9.5% to 6.7%. However, more than 100% of this decline was the result of 7.4 million potential workers fleeing the labor force. Adjusted to the labor force participation when George W. Bush left office, the unemployment rate has actually increased, from 9.7% to 10.9%, since the recovery began.

Here’s another way to look at it. During the past 8 years, America’s working-age population has gone up by 19.3 million, while the number of full-time-equivalent* (FTE) jobs has increased by only 0.4 million. Can you say, “lost decade?”



LINK

Posted by BigAppleBucky
New York
Member since Jan 2014
1807 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:59 pm to
We're having a record streak of improving employment numbers and general economic growth.

This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Volkosoby
Member since May 2017
2699 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 5:02 pm to
“Obama’s new normal” comprises slow GDP growth, a stagnant jobs market, and falling real household incomes"
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

However, more than 100% of this decline was the result of 7.4 million potential workers fleeing the labor force. Adjusted to the labor force participation when George W. Bush left office, the unemployment rate has actually increased, from 9.7% to 10.9%, since the recovery began.

Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?


quote:

Obama thinks he had something to do with President Trump's record setting economy!

quote:

Since the economic recovery began 52 months ago

Trump has already been in office for 52 months?

Geez, how time flies.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22808 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:15 pm to
So the labor participation rate has held flat, but the unemployment % have gone down. That means under Trump the improvement was real.
Posted by homesicktiger
High altitude hell
Member since Oct 2004
1367 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?


Cause democrats are lazy.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6526 posts
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?


I would say turning a steady decline into a stable line is an improvement.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram