- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Forbes: "Obama's Unemployment 'New Normal' Foretells A 'Lost Decade'"
Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:55 pm
Obama thinks he had something to do with President Trump's record setting economy!
Obama's Unemployment 'New Normal' Foretells A 'Lost Decade'
A quick look at the BLS Household Survey showed that, rather than being bad, December was actually a better-than-average month in President Obama’s “new normal” economy. This is not a huge accomplishment, given that “Obama’s new normal” comprises slow GDP growth, a stagnant jobs market, and falling real household incomes.
However, the nation moved 133,000 jobs closer to full-time-equivalent* (FTE) full employment during December, while during the average month during Obama’s so-called “economic recovery,” we moved 25,000 jobs farther away. So, December, as bad as it was in many respects, was better than average for Obama.
Since the economic recovery began 52 months ago, the “headline” U-3 unemployment rate has fallen from 9.5% to 6.7%. However, more than 100% of this decline was the result of 7.4 million potential workers fleeing the labor force. Adjusted to the labor force participation when George W. Bush left office, the unemployment rate has actually increased, from 9.7% to 10.9%, since the recovery began.
Here’s another way to look at it. During the past 8 years, America’s working-age population has gone up by 19.3 million, while the number of full-time-equivalent* (FTE) jobs has increased by only 0.4 million. Can you say, “lost decade?”
LINK
Obama's Unemployment 'New Normal' Foretells A 'Lost Decade'
A quick look at the BLS Household Survey showed that, rather than being bad, December was actually a better-than-average month in President Obama’s “new normal” economy. This is not a huge accomplishment, given that “Obama’s new normal” comprises slow GDP growth, a stagnant jobs market, and falling real household incomes.
However, the nation moved 133,000 jobs closer to full-time-equivalent* (FTE) full employment during December, while during the average month during Obama’s so-called “economic recovery,” we moved 25,000 jobs farther away. So, December, as bad as it was in many respects, was better than average for Obama.
Since the economic recovery began 52 months ago, the “headline” U-3 unemployment rate has fallen from 9.5% to 6.7%. However, more than 100% of this decline was the result of 7.4 million potential workers fleeing the labor force. Adjusted to the labor force participation when George W. Bush left office, the unemployment rate has actually increased, from 9.7% to 10.9%, since the recovery began.
Here’s another way to look at it. During the past 8 years, America’s working-age population has gone up by 19.3 million, while the number of full-time-equivalent* (FTE) jobs has increased by only 0.4 million. Can you say, “lost decade?”
LINK
Posted on 9/7/18 at 4:59 pm to Volkosoby
We're having a record streak of improving employment numbers and general economic growth.
This post was edited on 9/7/18 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 9/7/18 at 5:02 pm to BigAppleBucky
“Obama’s new normal” comprises slow GDP growth, a stagnant jobs market, and falling real household incomes"
Posted on 9/7/18 at 5:04 pm to Volkosoby
quote:
However, more than 100% of this decline was the result of 7.4 million potential workers fleeing the labor force. Adjusted to the labor force participation when George W. Bush left office, the unemployment rate has actually increased, from 9.7% to 10.9%, since the recovery began.
Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?
quote:
Obama thinks he had something to do with President Trump's record setting economy!
quote:
Since the economic recovery began 52 months ago
Trump has already been in office for 52 months?
Geez, how time flies.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:15 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
So the labor participation rate has held flat, but the unemployment % have gone down. That means under Trump the improvement was real.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:19 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?
Cause democrats are lazy.
Posted on 9/7/18 at 6:19 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Why hasn't the labor participation rate improved under Trump?
I would say turning a steady decline into a stable line is an improvement.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News