- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:18 pm to TrueTiger
So you present a question of flock cameras that are owned by private companies that track everyone, cars and providing possible privacy issues to that of capturing criminals?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:45 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Flock is innocent people being spied on. Shoplifting is a criminal being pursued.
Everyone is innocent until proven guilty so technically...
I don't like flock cameras either, just being a dick.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 1:07 pm to TrueTiger
As long as they have lasers that can kill you.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 1:18 pm to TrueTiger
Ok, so for the argument. They never claimed this was Police footage.
A person can use an independent video to push their point. We do it all the time.
I will say tho that it looks staged. Nobody in the parking lot, and so many parking spots empty.
Why would they park so far away when the lot is that empty? They want to get to their vehicle and just be gone. And where is the license plate for the vehicle they ran to?
Good piloting by the operator. If it's real, very, very cool that he/she stepped up.
As for actual police drones. Cheaper than choppers, but I don't know if many districts will want to fork over the costs of the equipment and operators.
Keep in mind wind and weather conditions that affect small flying objects. Especially city street drafts.
Also range limitations.
Honestly... If they could do it without using them for traffic ticketing, or constant surveillance I don't see why they shouldn't use more mobile tools.
A person can use an independent video to push their point. We do it all the time.
I will say tho that it looks staged. Nobody in the parking lot, and so many parking spots empty.
Why would they park so far away when the lot is that empty? They want to get to their vehicle and just be gone. And where is the license plate for the vehicle they ran to?
Good piloting by the operator. If it's real, very, very cool that he/she stepped up.
As for actual police drones. Cheaper than choppers, but I don't know if many districts will want to fork over the costs of the equipment and operators.
Keep in mind wind and weather conditions that affect small flying objects. Especially city street drafts.
Also range limitations.
Honestly... If they could do it without using them for traffic ticketing, or constant surveillance I don't see why they shouldn't use more mobile tools.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 9/7/26 at 1:24 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Flock is very unpopular, so are we OK with drones chasing down shoplifters?
I'm going to need you to connect these dots for me.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 9/7/26 at 1:26 pm to TrueTiger
I could most definitely consider the use of them for active shooter situations, or times when a person is holed up in a residence making a police standoff.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 1:28 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





