
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Flock camera installer calls police after being filmed in public
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:27 pm to weagle1999
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:27 pm to weagle1999

Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:31 pm to HagaDaga
quote:Martin Armstrong
Government should not be permitted to obtain information indirectly that the Constitution would require it to justify collecting directly.
Privacy protections need to catch up with technology because technological capability is advancing far faster than the laws written to restrain its abuse.
We should not accept a surveillance state as an inevitable fact of modern life. We should not accept that everything must collect data because everything now contains a computer.
We should not accept cameras following our cars, phones following our movements, algorithms following our purchases, and televisions monitoring our homes simply because somebody tells us this is the future.
If that is the future they are offering, then we have every right to reject it.
Posted on 9/14/26 at 8:36 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Every and all “citizen auditors” need their face bashed in. They are all a bunch of pussified man children who do it to stir the pot and piss you people off. And since they won’t square up to you, they will pull mace like the pussies they are.
I’m anti-Flock, but he has a point about “auditors.”

Popular
Back to top

0








