
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fewer Boomers. Fewer Tubes. More Adversaries. The strategic math doesn’t work.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:06 pm
quote:
The United States will soon carry out the largest reduction in sea-based strategic launch capacity in its history—at precisely the moment the threat demands more.
Why are we doing it? My dad had a t shirt during the Cold War that said “24 empty tubes 144 mushroom clouds - it’s Miller time.”
quote:
Coté’s survey concludes that today’s quiet submarines will likely stay survivable, and further quieting will likely continue outpacing the sensors hunting them.14 Read together, those findings cut two ways. The Columbia class’s acoustic margin—the quieting built into each hull (electric drive chief among the improvements)—will buy its survival, not the ocean itself. But, as the Type 096 matures, holding Chinese SSBNs at risk will get harder............
The fastest stopgap may already be entering the water. The Block V Virginia boats with the Virginia Payload Module that inherit the retiring SSGN mission—the future Arizona (SSGN-803) among them—add an 84-foot hull section and four large-diameter payload tubes, raising each boat’s cruise-missile capacity from 12 to 40 cells.32 Fielding SLCM-N in a nuclear-capable fraction of those cells, as Weaver recommends, would let an SSN answer regional crises without risking a 16-tube boomer or its scarce Trident tubes. SLCM-N cannot refloat lost SSBN tubes, but it would buy time and keep the strategic reserve strategic while the shipyards catch up.33 And sustained investment in the acoustic-superiority ecosystem—arrays, processing, and the operational-intelligence fusion that has been the Navy’s advantage for 80 years—preserves both halves of the U.S. position: U.S. boats survive while adversaries cannot be confident theirs will.
Very Interesting Article for the Strategic Warrior Class!!
How to Lose a Thermonuclear War.
This post was edited on 10/12/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:13 pm to Timeoday
Give us more money is all I hear.
Space would be the best place, you don't need the rocket to launch them, granted that comes with some serious problems when you try to keep them functional in 20 years.
Space would be the best place, you don't need the rocket to launch them, granted that comes with some serious problems when you try to keep them functional in 20 years.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:15 pm to Timeoday
quote:
the moment the threat demands more.
MOAR military spending!!!!
The debt and the political fallout that will come from it is a bigger threat. We should cut defense spending along with everything else in the budget and raise taxes until a budget is balanced.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 5:45 pm to ned nederlander
If we could just hold on to what we have we would not have to compete with what we sell. But, I have not ever seen a society willing to spend for concepts that can only cause its demise.
For some reason we are willing to fund whatever we can imagine.
For some reason we are willing to fund whatever we can imagine.

Popular
Back to top

2








