- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judge rejects bids to halt Georgia prosecution of Trump aides over 2020 election
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:50 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:50 pm to loogaroo
Trump's new attorney is supposed to be one of Atlanta's top Defense Attys:
Trump's new Attorney
Trump's new Attorney
quote:
Sadow has also represented a number of high-profile entertainers such as Usher, T.I. and rapper Gunna. Background on Anderson: Former UGA football star Adam Anderson gets a year for sexual battery, rape charges dropped
0
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:52 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:I anticipate you STFU.
I anticipate crickets from here on out
I also don't give a F anymore about playing by the rules against evil shits who don't care about the rules. Either we have a Constitution or we don't. If we don't, then all these losers in robes or with podiums have ZERO authority over anyone.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:55 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I anticipate crickets from here on out
Nah, we all know Hank doesn't have the first clue. He is consistently wrong in his legal interpretations. All legal analysis from him is rightly ignored.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:55 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Believe what you want. You’re the one wailing and gnashing your teeth because your perception of reality is distorted and not matching up with the events that are playing out.
What is my perception of reality exactly?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:59 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
I also don't give a F anymore about playing by the rules against evil shits who don't care about the rules. Either we have a Constitution or we don't. If we don't, then all these losers in robes or with podiums have ZERO authority over anyone.
I give this melt an 8.5 out of 10.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:00 pm to loogaroo
quote:
What is my perception of reality exactly?
Donald Trump is a virtuous martyr who did nothing wrong.
Where am I off in that assessment?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:00 pm to boosiebadazz
You support weaponizing our judicial system. Just admit it.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:01 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:03 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Donald Trump is a virtuous martyr who did nothing wrong.
What did he do wrong?
Had he not run for POTUS again, would he be facing these indictments? Yes or no?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:04 pm to loogaroo
quote:Big jump from:
You support weaponizing our judicial system. Just admit it.
(1) Boozie saying that this judge correctly applied a damned-simple statute
to
(2) "You SUPPORT weaponizing our judicial system!!!!!"
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:06 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:Fatty, you don't like me or my politics and that is fine, but there isn't an attorney on this board who will argue that my LEGAL analysis is not uniformly well-reasoned and sound.
we all know Hank doesn't have the first clue. He is consistently wrong in his legal interpretations. All legal analysis from him is rightly ignored.
Frankly, I could not care less what an imbecile such as yourself thinks of it.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:08 pm to AggieHank86
if you look at the big picture it's obvious that each legal action is a concerted effort to get Trump out the 2024 election.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:12 pm to loogaroo
quote:If it advances his Shiny New Daddy (who was lower energy than JEB!!1!!! last night), he's for anything.
You support weaponizing our judicial system. Just admit it.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:14 pm to AggieHank86
Sorry. I see you are unable to see the forest for the trees.
Go hide behind your laws. Some attorneys are ethical and some aren’t.
I’ll ask you the same question: Would these charges be brought against Trump had he not run for POTUS again?
And why didn’t they bring them sooner?
Go hide behind your laws. Some attorneys are ethical and some aren’t.
I’ll ask you the same question: Would these charges be brought against Trump had he not run for POTUS again?
And why didn’t they bring them sooner?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Fatty, you don't like me or my politics and that is fine, but there isn't an attorney on this board who will argue that my LEGAL analysis is not uniformly well-reasoned and sound.
But is it ethical?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:15 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Some attorneys are ethical and some aren’t.
it's the 99% that give the 1% a bad name
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:19 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:You do seem to claim to be the BabeRuth of melt
I give this melt an 8.5 out of 10.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:23 pm to loogaroo
So was I wrong in your perception of reality that he is a virtuous martyr who did nothing wrong?
A variety of things in my opinion. I don’t know if they’re criminal or not. I certainly think they were worthy of impeachment.
I don’t know. I don’t live in that alternate reality where he is not running for president.
quote:
What did he do wrong?
A variety of things in my opinion. I don’t know if they’re criminal or not. I certainly think they were worthy of impeachment.
quote:
Had he not run for POTUS again, would he be facing these indictments? Yes or no?
I don’t know. I don’t live in that alternate reality where he is not running for president.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 5:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I don’t know. I don’t live in that alternate reality where he is not running for president.
Typical cop out.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 5:55 pm to loogaroo
There is literally no way to know that. But you’re free to speculate all you want.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News