- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI and CIA graymail threats?
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:06 pm to RemyLeBeau
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:06 pm to RemyLeBeau
Time for Grenell to come back for a few days.
0
Posted on 10/5/20 at 10:14 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Barr still won't act on this because of the coveted institutions.
of course he will, a few small fish will get a slap on the wrist.
Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:24 pm to LSUSkip
Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:33 pm to Strannix
quote:
100% believe this, its time to rip the bandaid off and reveal the scope of the governments criminal acts
Easy for us to say, hard for anyone who want a career or has a career in that area. That's the problem.
Posted on 10/5/20 at 11:43 pm to cajunangelle
I want everything to be released. This isn’t about what “team” I’m on, it’s about what’s right and what’s wrong and knowing half the shite you can read about (no Twitter post, but actual documents) would make you fricking vomit. It would make you wish it was only a movie.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 7:55 am to AgentUtah
Why did you say this?
We are not watching a movie. We are in reality. Whoever told you we are watching a movie lied to you.
quote:
Lol you people are so fricked it’s not even funny.
quote:So you have read documents that would make me vomit more so then what is already in the public forum? Please go on with details.
I want everything to be released. This isn’t about what “team” I’m on, it’s about what’s right and what’s wrong and knowing half the shite you can read about (no Twitter post, but actual documents) would make you fricking vomit. It would make you wish it was only a movie.
We are not watching a movie. We are in reality. Whoever told you we are watching a movie lied to you.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 8:25 am to RemyLeBeau
quote:At this juncture when people are tagging Barr's spox person begging for the rule of law & justice...
LINK
It is a very sad state of affairs.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 8:29 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:13 am to Uncle Stu
quote:John Bash is one of five known U.S.A.O.’s who were tasked to provide supplemental support to the John Durham probe. Specifically Bash’s objective originated after the extensive unmasking of Michael Flynn was discovered; however, that objective was expanded in both scope and time as explained by AG Bill Barr on July 28, 2020.
Makes you wonder why Bash up and resigned today.....
It would be highly unusual for a U.S. attorney to resign in the middle of a very important aspect of his investigative responsibilities as assigned by the Attorney General.
Something about this is not passing the sniff test at all…
LINK
the comments of speculation are interesting.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:18 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Ratcliffe has reported that Haspel has refused a shite load of declassification because she’s worried about tarnishing the CIA......lol
It shouldn't be about avoiding negative views on the CIA. If someone breaks the fricking law they should pay the price. Enough with all this crap.
Lock them up, whoever they are. Appointed person, bureaucrat, agent, analyst, military people, or politicians. I dont care. If we want these people to obey they law, the first step is to hold people accountable.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:21 am to nes2010
This
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:24 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Scorched earth and rebuild
Its the only way.
Its ghana hurt like hell, but there is no other way to right the ship at this point other than to demolish it and build it from the ground up.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:41 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Something about this is not passing the sniff test at all…
agreed, the timing is awfully inconvenient
quote:
It would be highly unusual for a U.S. attorney to resign in the middle of a very important aspect of his investigative responsibilities as assigned by the Attorney General.
I've seen some comments that an offer to be in house counsel for a big oil company are in play, it would be a 10x - 15x pay raise. Also, the individual he's passing it off to, is coming in from DC and is highly highly thought of in the DOJ as a great fit to take this on. I dont know if thats a good thing or a swampy thing
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:11 am to Uncle Stu
Bash, John Employment History Employment Timeline
One can speculate that he was shown a shiny lucrative job to pull him out obviously, his prior positions probably snagged the lucrative 'private sector' job.
And yes, it appears as if the replacement is a cover up of the cover up, warm body.
SIDENOTE: As Sullivan sits on his hands how long do we have to wait for him to be recused runs through the courts, a month or two?
I have always wondered why AG Barr isn't stepping in the Flynn case- as it has gone well-beyond the courts running it's process. Yes, they send brilliant lawyers but enough is enough.
One can speculate that he was shown a shiny lucrative job to pull him out obviously, his prior positions probably snagged the lucrative 'private sector' job.
And yes, it appears as if the replacement is a cover up of the cover up, warm body.
SIDENOTE: As Sullivan sits on his hands how long do we have to wait for him to be recused runs through the courts, a month or two?
I have always wondered why AG Barr isn't stepping in the Flynn case- as it has gone well-beyond the courts running it's process. Yes, they send brilliant lawyers but enough is enough.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 11:04 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:26 am to obdobd918
quote:
IT'S HER TURN, TO GET FIRED!
We have to wait until after the election, we don't want to hurt anyone's feelings
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:53 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
But if there is other info Brennan had at his disposal that lead him to set the trap, how does he disclose it to defend himself without revealing “muh sources and methods”? How do we have transparency in his trial but protect the way we collect intelligence on Russia?
Such a tired argument are you ever gonna quit? If Trump was guilty they would have evidence and it would have been leaked. If Trump was guilty they wouldn't have had to frame him multiple times. Remember that war Obama and Hillary started with Russia in Syria, remember how Trump ended it? And what has Putin done since? He hasn't taken over America but the other side is sure in a hurry to sell it to China.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:56 am to Hurricane Mike
But I notice you didn’t address the actual question itself. How do you present classified info in a public trial?
Posted on 10/6/20 at 10:57 am to RemyLeBeau
Nuke it all from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Dismantle CIA, & give operational scope to MILINT.
Rebuild the FBI from the ground up.
Dismantle CIA, & give operational scope to MILINT.
Rebuild the FBI from the ground up.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:18 am to cajunangelle
quote:
SIDENOTE: As Sullivan sits on his hands how long do we have to wait for him to be recused runs through the courts, a month or two?
So the hearing was last Tuesday. As I recall, during the en banc hearing, I distinctly remember Sullivan's attorney stating the judge would NOT be "looking further into" it, nor ask for additional evidence or "open a further investigation"
YET
last tuesday, he clearly did just the opposite. On at least 2 instances he told the parties to submit further documentation and had the audacity to introduce Strozk's lawyers statement into the record of the Flynn case
He said that was due back to him by today(??) I think, and then of course, he'll drag his heels. I know I saw the official doc from Sullivan last week, I cant remember what the due date was exactly, it may be later this week.
Now, what I dont know, or havent actually seen, perhaps I missed it - is where Powell actually filed a motion for recusal. She said she was going to, she said she had it in her hand......but I didnt see if she followed through. My guess at the time, was that she requested an expeditious release of the transcript, because Sullivan and Gleeson were so overtly bias during the hearing, she was going to use their statements on the record to bolster her motion to recuse. It probably took her offguard, as her motion was 100% ready and she reconsidered after last Tuesday's call. (I'm guessing, just based on her words from the hearing)
Maybe she's still working on that, maybe she filed and I missed it, or maybe she's listened to some intuitive outside voices who have told her to cool her jets. A motion to recuse could drag this out even further, and despite everything, as partial and crooked as Sullivan is, Flynn is more likely to see a dismissal sooner rather than later if she holds off.
quote:
I have always wondered why AG Barr isn't stepping in the Flynn case- as it has gone well-beyond the courts running it's process. Yes they send brilliant lawyers but enough is enough.
But what could he possibly do? He's not part of the judicial branch. Sullivan has already implied impropriety on behalf of the President and secondarily Barr. If the AG got any more personally involved, it would only empower Sullivan and his DNC puppetmasters to squeeze this out even more.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:27 am to cajunangelle
quote:
It would be highly unusual for a U.S. attorney to resign in the middle of a very important aspect of his investigative responsibilities as assigned by the Attorney General.
Something about this is not passing the sniff test at all…
The simplest explanation is that Bash's investigation of his scope is complete, and he's moving to the private sector now that he's done.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 11:29 am to VoxDawg
nowwwwwww you embrace Occam 
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News