- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:20 am to Wednesday
Who does this woman represent bc they need their money back
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:20 am to Wednesday
quote:
should have gotten a ruling re: privilege before she even started
She admitted at the start this would come up, which is why she wanted the other witness first, to be able to show there is there, there... Then bring him up.
Sounds like she was unaware of old boy talking to the bar yesterday
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:20 am to Lsut81
Is Bradley clamming up now? On the advice of the GA Bar, sighting Rule 1.6?


Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:20 am to Wednesday
quote:
Who does this woman represent bc they need their money back
She can represent me with those big guns she has...
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:21 am to tigerpawl
Judge has called the bullshite that what she is asking isn't privelidged...
However, he is refusing bc "the bar told me it is and I can lose my license"
However, he is refusing bc "the bar told me it is and I can lose my license"
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:22 am to Hangover Haven
Frankly, I'm kinda liking her confidence. She's smirking because she has some aces up her sleeve.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:22 am to Wednesday
quote:
Who does this woman represent bc they need their money back
One of the group of 30 that Fani brought the case against... The one that initially outted this relationship.
Trump, Meadows, and Giuliana all have attorneys in the room though
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:22 am to Lsut81
I bet ten days that Fani will be allowed to continue.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:23 am to idlewatcher
quote:
She's smirking because she has some aces up her sleeve.
Shes apparently got texts from him already confirming there was an affair in 2019.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:23 am to Wednesday
quote:I've always held that for Trump being such a forceful, assertive person, that he consistently hires wimpy, unorganized attorneys.
Who does this woman represent bc they need their money back
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:24 am to themunch
quote:
I bet ten days that Fani will be allowed to continue.
Thats a whole separate discussion... This is simply about her already lying under oath that the relationship didn't start until after she promoted him to the case.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:24 am to Lsut81
quote:
However, he is refusing bc "the bar told me it is and I can lose my license"
How does being held in contempt affect his license?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:25 am to Lsut81
quote:
Judge has called the bullshite that what she is asking isn't privelidged...
However, he is refusing bc "the bar told me it is and I can lose my license"
There's a difference between confidentiality and privilege.
That said, he's clearly been threatened and is scrambling not to have to testify about this.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:26 am to udtiger
quote:
That said, he's clearly been threatened and is scrambling not to have to testify about this.
Scylla and Charybdis…
If he doesn’t thread the needle just right, he’s getting fricked by one or the other.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:26 am to Lsut81
quote:
Shes apparently got texts from him already confirming there was an affair in 2019.
:kern.com:
WHo is Miss Yerdie anyway?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:26 am to Lsut81
She needed to impeach and cross-examine him on those texts.
She looks unprepared and she should have waited on her first witness.
Not a good idea. This is a terrible direct examination and she should have gotten clarity on this when they argued the motion to quash.
She looks unprepared and she should have waited on her first witness.
Not a good idea. This is a terrible direct examination and she should have gotten clarity on this when they argued the motion to quash.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:26 am to Lsut81
Well it seems it might play a part in her continuing then.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:29 am to themunch
Man...that's an angry set of boobies on that blonde.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:29 am to idlewatcher
quote:
WHo is Miss Yerdie anyway?
Apparently isn't a lawyer and has knowledge that they were banging in 2019.
Sounds like all of these people who spoke to the defense attorney and provided insight that this was going on have gotten cold feet and or been threatened.
Back to top



0






