Started By
Message

re: Emails show Katie Hobbs threatened County Board With Arrest, Indictment

Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:56 pm to
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:56 pm to
quote:

There is zero chance that law is constitutional

Why is that?
Posted by Gatorsingreenville
Sc
Member since Oct 2022
347 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 2:34 am to
So we can get cali back we give them az
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68582 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 3:29 am to
Well Gilbertsin sounds like a democrat.

So I already don’t trust her.

quote:

When the voter arrives at a second location, the e-poll book flags that they have already received a ballot, according to the manual. Upon check-in, a message pops up that says “The voter has already been issued a ballot for this election! Allow Reissue? Please call the hotline if you have questions.”


shite like this doesn’t scream secure.

And you have the whole issue of voters not being checked out correctly that received a ballot but didn’t vote because 30% of the tabulators were down.

And the response is we don’t know why voters werent checked out correctly.


quote:

The procedure is a precaution designed to prevent double voting by guarding against one voter casting multiple ballots at different vote centers. Because the voter wasn’t checked out, the county has no easy way to confirm the voter didn’t already vote.


This is ripe for fraud. Arizona is clown world.

This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 3:33 am
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5564 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Why is that?


The law creates a criminal offense without any certainty as to compliance. It is too vague.

quote:

A person charged with performance of any duty under any law


You don’t see a problem with that?
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 4:22 pm
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36761 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

The law creates a criminal offense without any certainty as to compliance. It is too vague.


No they were responsible for a job they refused to perform it makes pretty clear sense that if you don't follow with your election duties you'd be charged
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram