- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Doesn't it strike you as awfully coincidental? (Science vs Religious Belief)
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:17 am to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:17 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:Orbital Inclination, Solar Luminosity Fluctuation aren't really helpful are they though?
Start here:
LINK
Let us know what you find out.
So which of the remaining theories explains the graph?
1
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:18 am to SpidermanTUba
Here is what I think is crazy--
Wasting time debating evolution.
Wasting time debating evolution.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:22 am to I B Freeman
Crazy 2--
Arguing that the government should take action on "global warming"
Anybody can see that is just about money whether warming is happening or not. Only fools think of climate change in terms of government.
How arrogant--and foolish--is it to think the US government could change the climate?? ("The day the oceans stopped rising")
Arguing that the government should take action on "global warming"
Anybody can see that is just about money whether warming is happening or not. Only fools think of climate change in terms of government.
How arrogant--and foolish--is it to think the US government could change the climate?? ("The day the oceans stopped rising")
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:30 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Orbital Inclination, Solar Luminosity Fluctuation aren't really helpful are they though?
Why not?
quote:
So which of the remaining theories explains the graph?
You tell us.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:30 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Anybody can see that is just about money whether warming is happening or not.
Anyone can just "see it"
Now that's science!
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:34 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Anyone can just "see it"
Now that's science!
Here is your democrat science on display
LINK
The SOB said the artic ice caps would disappear in 7 years according to government science. What he didn't say was how many millions he made trading European carbon credits and how he planned to do the same in the US. Al Gore--taking advantage of naive liberals for a generation.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:36 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:You tell me
Why not?
quote:Oh, I'd fall in the Orbital Inclination, Solar Luminosity Fluctuation camp
So which of the remaining theories explains the graph?
You tell us.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:36 am to I B Freeman
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:57 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:You made up the opinion. Don't expect me to explain it.
Why?
quote:Right. But it wasn't simply published and forgotten about like so many academic papers on the subject. It received scrutiny, attention and a backlash.
It did "sail through." The Baliunas and Soon paper was published.
quote:Well. Since you don't know. I can only assume you aren't well read on the subject and you only get your information from blogs.
About what?
Posted on 1/3/14 at 12:02 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:That is true.
There are only a tiny handful of people with PhD's in a physical science who are active in research and that publish anti-AGW papers.
quote:Not at all. First, actively publishing academics don't have a monopoly on knowledge. Secondly, Baliunas' specialization doesn't align with mine. I'm best read and knowlegeable on numeric modeling techniques. Not solar variation. But feel free to continue jumping to conclusions.
If getting your science from people who are actual trained scientists is important to you (which it isn't) - you would have known who Baliunas was.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 12:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:It's actually worse than that. I haven't cited any blog material. He's presuming that's the limits of my knowledge. Thin evidence.
The point was raised when you dismissed a previous poster's citing of a "blog" as not worth field consideration.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 12:43 pm to AUbused
whackage coming soon?
Page 16 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News