re: Does anyone believe the latest political charge against Trump is valid?

quote:

---

It is true and the SCOTUS has ruled on that:

---

I realize that in defending your position, you can't go deeper than tweets, but that wasn't a SCOTUS decision and that isn't what was ruled. The court said the opposite, in fact:

Direct quote from the court decision:

[C]ourts are accorded the power to review guidelines outlining, what is, and what is not, a ‘presidential record’ under the terms of the PRA. The PRA does not
bestow on the President the power to assert sweeping authority over whatever materials he chooses to designate as presidential records without any possibility
of judicial review.

The court stated that Armstrong I only barred judicial review of “creation, management, and disposal decisions” of the President and not “the initial classification of existing materials.” Id. at 1294.

and:

But the Court need not decide this question because whether judicial review is available or not, the relief that plaintiff seeks – that the Archivist assume “custody and control” of the audiotapes – is not available under
the PRA.

LINK

The classification of the Clinton documents simply wasn't an issue in that case because the Court ruled that it couldn't order return of the alleged personal documents.

That's not what this case is about. Trump allegedly admitted that the docs were secret and he couldn't do anything about them. We'll see what is proven in court.