Started By
Message

re: DHS and Intel Community Media Outlets Proactively Move to Defend Dominion Voting Systems

Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:49 am to
Posted by 850SaintsGator
Pensacola
Member since Sep 2021
2241 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The technician using the thumb drive wouldn't even know he was updating software to change algorithms. He simply can be given orders that precinct(s) such and such need their "firmware" updated. All the technician is charged with is downloading the firmware to at thumb drive, going to the precinct, showing credentials, updating each machine with the current version of firmware and signing out. The precinct personnel and the IT technician have no clue what the firmware update entails. Just like when you get an software update on your phone, PC, GPS, Fish Finder, etc. you have no clue what the software updates entail. In fact that information can be kept secret to one person.



That’s a cool story but it’ll never happen.

No supervisor of the election would allow an “update” while a live election is taken place and even then- the post election audit would detect this.

Also, any and all hand recounts would sniff that shite out quickly - there would be a difference in paper ballots and votes counted on thw machine
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Dominion is going to own some people.


- Judge Holden
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:51 am to
quote:

No supervisor of the election would allow an “update” while a live election is taken place and even then- the post election audit would detect this.


Here’s a fella that just makes up stuff as he goes along.
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1140 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 10:54 am to
getting more powerful by the day
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6489 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

This is a good point - each machine has a very tight chain of custody and any variance would be uncovered quickly so any nefarious thumb drive attempt would be detected


It's been shown that multiple users shared the same login. That's not a tight chain of custody.

The user logs were also deleted. It's hard to detect nefarious activity when the people in charge of elections intentionally delete evidence to prevent others from verifying all the activity on the voting machine.

quote:

Plus, if a vote was fractioned off- the post election audit would note that. Also - there is a finite number of ballots cast , this is good base number and any deviation is exposed.


Unless, of course, a state, say Georgia for example, illegally shredded ballots before they could be completely audited.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
8084 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 2:41 pm to
The sad thing is, normies will buy this- hook, line, and sinker.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram