- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems gonna try to convict Hegseth of war crimes?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:40 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It's just straight up murder of another country's civilians.
Yes... poor innocent fishermen civilians.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:41 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Doesn’t change the question. Do you want the standard to be an unsourced allegation from the media?
The Armed Services Committees have been hearing directly from the persons involved. You can rest easy about sourcing.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:41 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
I asked you to explain why we have aircraft carriers staged, and shutting down a sovereign nation's airspace, and killing fisherman, oh and following up to assinate any survivors? And explain a possible land attack that He said might happen. I don't need history lessons or deflections.
Your entire post was a deflection. I asked if you wanted the standard to open an investigation being an un sourced allegation from the media. You responded with a complete deflection.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:41 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
quote:
How is Venezuela a threat to Americans today?
I wish they'd tell us.
You're been told. Repeatedly. You choose not to accept the explanation. frick you and all you TDS f@gs crying about POS narcoterrorists being vaporized... after they've had plenty of warning.
Eat shite, pussies.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:42 pm to Bunk Moreland
Your homosexuality is beginning to show through again. Have you wept for them bitterly yet?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:42 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
You're been told. Repeatedly
Weird. Somehow I'm not terrified of them, like you are.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Nice take Roger, and I agree.
Except, I had no confidence in him when he was promoted from Fox News to SOD.
Except, I had no confidence in him when he was promoted from Fox News to SOD.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:44 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Except, I had no confidence in him when he was promoted from Fox News to SOD.
I dont watch Fox and had never heard of the guy. I think he's trying, just way in over his head.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Lol, never heard of the guy. Ok
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:45 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
The mission orders were to destroy the vessel.
Would it come down to the hair splitting of "destroyed" vs merely "disabled?"
"Our mission was to destroy the boat. We judged that it was only disabled, so I ordered the second attack to complete the mission."
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Weird. Somehow I'm not terrified of them, like you are.
I'm not terrified of them. frick them. They can die like the worthless rats they are and burn in hell. I'm fine with that. Which is why I support their continued extermination.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:46 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Lol, never heard of the guy.
I tke it youre a huge cable news fan..
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:46 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
I'm not terrified of them. frick them
Then why the saber rattling. Who do you want saved?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:47 pm to Decatur
quote:
The Armed Services Committees have been hearing directly from the persons involved. You can rest easy about sourcing.
2 things. That is non-responsive to my question about standards for an investigation. Second- how do you know who they are talking to? What is your source?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:49 pm to BBONDS25
Ok B, I digressed, my bad
Yes, he should be investigated for his actions as the SOD and let the chips fall as they may.
Would you like to elaborate on my digression as to why we are killing fishermen in Venezuela and why Pete stepped in it?
Yes, he should be investigated for his actions as the SOD and let the chips fall as they may.
Would you like to elaborate on my digression as to why we are killing fishermen in Venezuela and why Pete stepped in it?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:50 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Would it come down to the hair splitting of "destroyed" vs merely "disabled?"
"Our mission was to destroy the boat. We judged that it was only disabled, so I ordered the second attack to complete the mission."
Works for me...
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Again…you’re an attorney. This isn’t the standard. Not to mention, they did deny doing anything illegal. That’s a denial.
I was just assessing it logically. If the double tap didn't occur, they could have said that. Are you admitting that a double tap would have been illegal?
I think Hegseth and Leavitt are hiding behind (what I consider) some novel legal theory about killing shipwreck survivors being legal.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That is non-responsive to my question about standards for an investigation.
Are you really complaining about standards to open a Congressional investigation?
quote:
Second- how do you know who they are talking to? What is your source?
I’ve read it in several articles that members of Congress have been speaking with those involved in the matter. I’m sure you can find some.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:53 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’m sure you can find some.
He's proven many times you have to literally lay it all out for him, and explain it a few times.
Popular
Back to top


0


