- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Current idea that cold is from global warming fundamentally flawed?
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:37 am to TejasHorn
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:37 am to TejasHorn
quote:
You think man can destroy the planet? What intoxicating vanity. Let me tell you about our planet. Earth is four-and-a-half-billion-years-old. There's been life on it for nearly that long, 3.8 billion years. Bacteria first; later the first multicellular life, then the first complex creatures in the sea, on the land. Then finally the great sweeping ages of animals, the amphibians, the dinosaurs, at last the mammals, each one enduring millions on millions of years, great dynasties of creatures rising, flourishing, dying away -- all this against a background of continuous and violent upheaval. Mountain ranges thrust up, eroded away, cometary impacts, volcano eruptions, oceans rising and falling, whole continents moving, an endless, constant, violent change, colliding, buckling to make mountains over millions of years. Earth has survived everything in its time. It will certainly survive us. If all the nuclear weapons in the world went off at once and all the plants, all the animals died and the earth was sizzling hot for a hundred thousand years, life would survive, somewhere: under the soil, frozen in Arctic ice. Sooner or later, when the planet was no longer inhospitable, life would spread again. --Michael Crichton
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:39 am to TejasHorn
Liberals love to trash AGW skeptics as idiots or "deniers" but they never explain their solution to the problem in practical terms. Geauxxx brought up great points but you never hear a liberal explain their solutions in a practical way. They ramble on and on about getting rid of fossil fuels. The funniest thing is how they so harshly criticize their own country's (U.S.) and pretend that China, India, and Russia are anymore environmentally responsible than the U.S. They also see no downside to tacking on HUGE taxes on alternative energy and are apparently fine with wrecking world economies to fix a problem that may or may not even be fixable.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 8:49 am to TejasHorn
quote:....and I'm glad it isn't.
Wow. I'm glad this attitude is rare outside of the poli board.
Posted on 1/13/14 at 9:12 pm to NC_Tigah
In these posts I see a lot of strong stances on man's role in global warming, or lack thereof. I tried to convey earlier that I am completely uninterested in information/opinions/facts pertaining to that.
I see no posts that supports or refute the notion that this vortex theory exists with arctic warming, and with the only current flaw being that the arctic is actually getting colder.
Any takers for or against? Perhaps the lack of input speaks to how half-backed this theory is.
I see no posts that supports or refute the notion that this vortex theory exists with arctic warming, and with the only current flaw being that the arctic is actually getting colder.
Any takers for or against? Perhaps the lack of input speaks to how half-backed this theory is.
This post was edited on 1/13/14 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 1/13/14 at 9:43 pm to KnoxvilleBerryTiger
See my sig line (or listen to the whole reading)
Charlton Heston reads Michael Crichton
Charlton Heston reads Michael Crichton
This post was edited on 1/13/14 at 9:56 pm
Popular
Back to top
