- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Colorado Democrats Vote Down Bill Mandating Medical Care To Born-Alive Survivors Of Aborti
Posted on 2/13/20 at 8:35 pm to conservativewifeymom
Posted on 2/13/20 at 8:35 pm to conservativewifeymom
....them democrats will kill those babies anyway they can.
Posted on 2/13/20 at 8:54 pm to skidry
quote:Exactly. There is already a Federal statute passed in the early 2000s that deals with this.
Aren’t constitutional rights conferred at birth? If so, wouldn’t this be age discrimination by denying the child emergency medical care simply because he/she is seconds old? No way this can pass constitutional muster.
This is simply dishonest electioneering that Republicans continue to lie about.
Posted on 2/13/20 at 8:58 pm to conservativewifeymom
In the past year, how many times has there been a live birth after a botched abortion?
Is it a massive, pervasive problem, screaming for legislative action?
Is it a massive, pervasive problem, screaming for legislative action?
This post was edited on 2/13/20 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
In the past year, how many times has there been a live birth after a botched abortion?
Is it a massive, pervasive problem, screaming for legislative action?
So only one person is held a slave in the US last year.
If legislation is passed that helps prevent this your against?
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:03 pm to teke184
quote:you recall incorrectly.
One such survivor was just at the State Of The Union IIRC.
That little girl was not an “abortion survivor.“ She was simply a very, very early preemie who survived infancy.
Trump simply used her as a segue into an abortion argument.
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:04 pm to AggieHank86
You wonder. Let's say its miniscule.
Why not protect the baby?
This does not come close to touching all those first trimester abortions. It just prevents murder of a baby.
If its thousands or a handful isn't the principle the same?
Why not protect the baby?
This does not come close to touching all those first trimester abortions. It just prevents murder of a baby.
If its thousands or a handful isn't the principle the same?
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:09 pm to goatmilker
quote:You tend to do too much inferring.
So only one person is held a slave in the US last year.
If legislation is passed that helps prevent this your against?
I do not oppose this bill. I am just curious whether it is addressing an ACTUAL problem ... or is instead pure Right virtue signaling, creating a crime for an action that never happens. Enacting statues purely for the cameras.
This post was edited on 2/13/20 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:11 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Is it a massive, pervasive problem, screaming for legislative action?
quote:
You tend to do too much inferring.
Perhaps
Posted on 2/13/20 at 9:42 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
murder is now legal in CO as long as the victim is the newborn victim of an unsuccessful abortion. Dear God.....
God yall are gullible as frick
Posted on 2/13/20 at 10:17 pm to conservativewifeymom
Idiots sacrificing to Baal.
Posted on 2/13/20 at 11:24 pm to conservativewifeymom
Bernie and Warren want to give Medicare to all for free, but won't give medical care to a baby that was just born and in need of it.My blood is boiling so bad and this country is in trouble if they get elected.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 12:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
In the past year, how many times has there been a live birth after a botched abortion?
Is it a massive, pervasive problem, screaming for legislative action?
In 2017, in a single state (Minnesota), there were 10,000 abortions. 3 were born alive after a failed abortion.
That is one state, in one year. 0.03 percent.
Massive problem? Well yeah-- .03 percent is actually pretty darn significant. That is 3 children out of 10,000 and those 3 children deserved the chance for resuscitative efforts. Would you not agree?
These infants are born alive and not provided resuscitation efforts, and in some cases euthanized outright.
So yep, I would say that a law aimed to compel a PHYSICIAN to provide care for a living infant is not irrelevant.
I will even quote you numbers from a leftist source, so you don't freak out about some right-wing news site
Posted on 2/14/20 at 1:01 am to Blueprint
quote:
Idiots sacrificing to Baal.
Keep all Baal and Moloch worshipping posts in the Q thread. Thank you.
Posted on 2/14/20 at 7:41 am to Iron Lion
quote:
Keep all Baal and Moloch worshipping posts in the Q thread. Thank you.
No.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News