- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clinton appointed Judge orders full restoration of DACA program
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:19 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:19 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Such weight
The judges requirement was that it isn't arbitrary.
Unconstitutional meets the definition of unaribtrary, no?
0
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:20 pm to DrunkerThanThou
quote:You need to get out of your cocoon. Gallop poll June 14, 2018 --83% approve of allowing DACA immigrants to become citizens.
Is “because the American Republic wants it to end” not a good enough reason?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:24 pm to texridder
quote:
You need to get out of your cocoon. Gallop poll June 14, 2018 --83% approve of allowing DACA immigrants to become citizens
The duly elected president ran on this issue and won
Like he said, republic, a collection of 50 states. Nobody cares that 100 percent of the loons in San Fran NYC and Chicago agree on something stupid
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:30 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Such weight
Do you recall even Obama said he couldn't do it, but did it anyway and just counted on the courts to back his play.
DACA was headed to a defeat in court but the AGs stayed their case when Trump issued the rescission EO.
Trump should absolutely ignore this ruling.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:31 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
The duly elected president ran on this issue and won
He didn't run on DACA and I guarantee he doesn't even know the details of it 
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:37 pm to JuiceTerry
You are such a dumbshit
The “trump doesn’t know anything” schtic is worse than “he doesn’t work” bullshite.
Lazy, step it up
The “trump doesn’t know anything” schtic is worse than “he doesn’t work” bullshite.
Lazy, step it up
Posted on 1/1/19 at 1:39 pm to gthog61
What up, blue velvet? Happy new year! 
Posted on 1/1/19 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes Pro. Odickhead used an EO...
Posted on 1/1/19 at 2:18 pm to bamarep
Daca is not a federal law. It was an EO that can be revoked by the current President. Good luck with that Judge
Posted on 1/1/19 at 2:21 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
He didn't run on DACA and I guarantee he doesn't even know the details of it
quote:
Trump said on the campaign trail that he would “immediately terminate” DACA.
LINK
Watching you post is like watching Chris Farley fall on that coffee table over and over and over again.
You're almost as bad as texridder
Posted on 1/1/19 at 3:46 pm to bamarep
Just fricking ignore this judge.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:35 pm to texridder
Is that supposed to be significant?
Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:41 pm to texridder
quote:
Gallop poll June 14, 2018 --83% approve of allowing DACA immigrants to become citizens.
Gallop poll......
Since when is EO validity decided on by popularity polls??
You people.
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:44 pm to texridder
quote:
More responses than the original OP.
Impressive.
So easy.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 4:44 pm to Dale51
The judge has no standing and no constitutional authority to interfere, and should be put in his place.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:04 pm to Dale51
quote:
Gallop poll June 14, 2018 --83% approve of allowing DACA immigrants to become citizens.
Gallop poll......
Since when is EO validity decided on by popularity polls??
You people.
I didn't post anything about the validity of an EO.
I quoted the post I was responding to, which claimed popular support was against DACA. Did you miss that, or just ignore it?
It's incredible the number of times on here someone responds to a specific post, and the loons here assume that means that the poster is taking a unequivocal stance either for or against the larger issue.
Yours is a perfect example.
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:12 pm to texridder
Melt
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:21 pm to texridder
quote:
I didn't post anything about the validity of an EO.
I did.
quote:
I quoted the post I was responding to, which claimed popular support was against DACA. Did you miss that, or just ignore it?
The claim was that the EO was supported by the will of the people, which it was...you inferred it wasn't by stating a gallop poll. That connects the two.
This post was edited on 1/1/19 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 1/1/19 at 5:24 pm to bamarep
Judge should be impeached.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News